From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
"Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: define arch_vm_get_page_prot to set _PAGE_IOMAP on VM_IO vmas
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:17:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC0CA07.3000306@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC0C318.90401@zytor.com>
On 10/21/2010 03:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 03:40 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Set _PAGE_IOMAP in ptes mapping a VM_IO vma. This says that the mapping
>> is of a real piece of physical hardware, and not just system memory.
>>
>> Xen, in particular, uses to this to inhibit the normal pfn->mfn conversion
>> that would normally happen - in other words, treat the address directly
>> as a machine physical address without converting it from pseudo-physical.
>>
>> [ Impact: make VM_IO mappings map the right thing under Xen ]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
>>
> Am I the only one who thinks this seems extremely odd that the guest is
> trusted to make this distinction?
Xen PV guests are always responsible for constructing ptes with machine
addresses in them (ie, doing their own pseudo-physical to machine
address conversion), and Xen verifies that the pages they want to map
either belong to them or have been granted to them. The _PAGE_IOMAP
flag is a kernel-internal one which allows us to distinguish between
ptes intended to map memory vs machine hardware addresses; it is not
part of the Xen ABI.
If you're passing a device through to a domain, the domain is given
access to the device's address space so it can legally map those pages
(and if an IOMMU is available, the device is constrained to only DMA
that domain's memory).
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-21 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 22:40 [PATCH] x86: define arch_vm_get_page_prot to set _PAGE_IOMAP on VM_IO vmas Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-21 22:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-21 23:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2010-10-22 0:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-22 15:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-10-22 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-22 18:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-10-22 18:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-10-22 19:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-22 19:11 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-10-22 19:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-22 19:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-22 19:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC0CA07.3000306@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox