From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752264Ab0JVCxK (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:53:10 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:47788 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751267Ab0JVCxI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:53:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4CC0FBDC.4010700@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:50:04 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , CAI Qian , "David S. Miller" , Felipe Balbi , Ingo Molnar , Jan Beulich , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Kevin Hilman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michael Ellerman , Michal Simek , Paul Mundt , Peter Zijlstra , Russell King , Russell King , Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , Tomi Valkeinen , Vivek Goyal , Yinghai Lu , ext Grazvydas Ignotas , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] memblock for 2.6.37 References: <201010220050.o9M0ognt032167@hera.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/21/2010 06:59 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:50 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> >> The unmerged branch is at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git core-memblock-for-linus >> >> The premerged branch is at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git core-memblock-for-linus-merged > > I always tend to take the unmerged version, because I want to see what > the conflicts are (it gives me some view of what clashes), but when > people do pre-merges I then try to compare my merge against theirs. > Sounds like a very good idea. I'll take it as a request to continue to do both if there are anything but trivial conflicts. > However, in this case, your pre-merged version differs. But I think > it's your merge that was incorrect. You left this line: > > obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_EARLY_RES) += early_res.o > > in kernel/Makefile, even though kernel/early_res.c is gone. > > I'll push out my merge, but please do verify that it all looks ok. > > Linus > You're right, my mistake. Thanks for checking and fixing it up. I will pull your tree later and test if and add the fixes for the other trees. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.