From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751941Ab0JYA6y (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:58:54 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:65078 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751377Ab0JYA6x (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:58:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4CC4D681.8020809@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:59:45 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: "akpm >> Andrew Morton" , Paul Menage , Stephane Eranian , LKML , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cgroups: Allow to bind a subsystem to a cgroup hierarchy References: <4CC146A4.9090505@cn.fujitsu.com> <4CC146D4.7030009@cn.fujitsu.com> <1287751631.15336.33.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1287751631.15336.33.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 16:09 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: >> For example, we can't decide a cgroup's cpuset.mems and >> cpuset.cpus automatically, so cpuset is not bindable. > > You mean to say that you cannot add cpuset to an existing hierarchy > right? Not that you cannot add perf/cpuacct to an existing cpuset > hierarchy? > Exactly. You can see from the example.