From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kvm: write protect memory after slot swap
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:32:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC54EB8.9020604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101025012124.GA31262@redhat.com>
On 10/25/2010 03:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I have observed the following bug trigger:
>
> 1. userspace calls GET_DIRTY_LOG
> 2. kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access is called and makes a page ro
> 3. page fault happens and makes the page writeable
> fault is logged in the bitmap appropriately
> 4. kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log swaps slot pointers
>
> a lot of time passes
>
> 5. guest writes into the page
> 6. userspace calls GET_DIRTY_LOG
>
> At point (5), bitmap is clean and page is writeable,
> thus, guest modification of memory is not logged
> and GET_DIRTY_LOG returns an empty bitmap.
>
> The rule is that all pages are either dirty in the current bitmap,
> or write-protected, which is violated here.
>
> It seems that just moving kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access down
> to after the slot pointer swap should fix this bug.
>
> Warning: completely untested.
> Please comment.
> Note: fix will be needed for -stable etc.
Excellent catch, I stared at this code for a while and didn't see the
bug. Patch applied.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-25 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-25 1:21 [PATCH RFC] kvm: write protect memory after slot swap Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-25 7:27 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-10-25 9:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 12:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-26 6:38 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-10-25 9:32 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-10-25 11:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 11:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-25 11:51 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-24 19:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-25 9:18 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC54EB8.9020604@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox