From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752966Ab0JYLCK (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:02:10 -0400 Received: from e28smtp04.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.4]:59085 "EHLO e28smtp04.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751210Ab0JYLCJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:02:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4CC563A9.3020308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:32:01 +0530 From: divya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yong Zhang CC: Subrata Modak , linux-kernel , Linuxppc-dev , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Anton Blanchard , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: BUG with the kernel version 2.6.36-rc1 on power machine References: <4CC13B2C.7090908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4CC13FFF.7040200@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1287774802.19497.1.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <20101023093630.GA3036@zhy> In-Reply-To: <20101023093630.GA3036@zhy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 23 October 2010 03:06 PM, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:43:21AM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > >> This is equally seen for both Power6 and Power7 machines. >> > Seems resolved by part of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/13/67 > > Thanks, > Yong > > >> Regards-- >> Subrata >> >> On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 00:37 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: >> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: divya >>> Date: Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:10 PM >>> Subject: Re: BUG with the kernel version 2.6.36-rc1 on power machine >>> To: LKML, benh@kernel.crashing.org, >>> linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org >>> >>> >>> >>> On Friday 22 October 2010 12:50 PM, divya wrote: >>> Hi , >>> >>> With the latest version of kernel 2.6.36-rc1 running on the >>> power machine, came across the following call trace >>> >>> BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 31 >>> turning off the locking correctness validator. >>> Call Trace: >>> [c00000000e0bfb60] [c0000000000119a0] .show_stack+0x6c/0x16c >>> (unreliable) >>> [c00000000e0bfc10] [c0000000000c39b8] .lockdep_init_map >>> +0x194/0x630 >>> [c00000000e0bfcf0] [c0000000005524f8] .mousedev_create >>> +0xcc/0x234 >>> [c00000000e0bfda0] [c00000000093fb58] .mousedev_init+0x38/0xa0 >>> [c00000000e0bfe30] [c0000000000097e4] .do_one_initcall >>> +0xd8/0x1c8 >>> [c00000000e0bfee0] [c0000000009004ac] .kernel_init+0x23c/0x2f8 >>> [c00000000e0bff90] [c00000000002ad30] .kernel_thread+0x54/0x70 >>> >>> The config file used for make oldconfig is being attached >>> >>> Thanks >>> Divya >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I meant 2.6.36-git1(b5153163ed580e) , and not 2.6.36-rc1. >>> Sorry for the confusion. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Divya >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>> linux-kernel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards& Thanks-- >>> Subrata >>> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >> The patch at http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/13/67 resolves the issue. But this is not a part of 2.6.36-git6 , when will it be pulled into the upstream? Thanks Divya