From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kvm: write protect memory after slot swap
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:40:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC56CC6.4020703@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC54EB8.9020604@redhat.com>
Am 25.10.2010 11:32, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 03:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> I have observed the following bug trigger:
>>
>> 1. userspace calls GET_DIRTY_LOG
>> 2. kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access is called and makes a page ro
>> 3. page fault happens and makes the page writeable
>> fault is logged in the bitmap appropriately
>> 4. kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log swaps slot pointers
>>
>> a lot of time passes
>>
>> 5. guest writes into the page
>> 6. userspace calls GET_DIRTY_LOG
>>
>> At point (5), bitmap is clean and page is writeable,
>> thus, guest modification of memory is not logged
>> and GET_DIRTY_LOG returns an empty bitmap.
>>
>> The rule is that all pages are either dirty in the current bitmap,
>> or write-protected, which is violated here.
>>
>> It seems that just moving kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access down
>> to after the slot pointer swap should fix this bug.
>>
>> Warning: completely untested.
>> Please comment.
>> Note: fix will be needed for -stable etc.
>
> Excellent catch, I stared at this code for a while and didn't see the
> bug. Patch applied.
>
BTW, while this was an annoying one for graphic emulation, wasn't it
potentially lethal for live migration?
The issue looks like is was introduced with the switch to SRCU, so every
kernel since 2.6.34 should be affected, correct?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-25 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-25 1:21 [PATCH RFC] kvm: write protect memory after slot swap Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-25 7:27 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-10-25 9:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 12:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-26 6:38 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-10-25 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-25 11:40 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-10-25 11:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-25 11:51 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-24 19:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-25 9:18 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC56CC6.4020703@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox