From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761276Ab0J0NkB (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:40:01 -0400 Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.62.213]:53337 "HELO 30.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1761262Ab0J0NkA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:40:00 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 398 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:39:59 EDT Message-ID: <4CC82A13.8000909@eukrea.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:33:07 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Eric_B=E9nard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sascha Hauer CC: Grant Likely , amit.kucheria@canonical.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, daniel@caiaq.de, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= , valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Add some core definitions for MX53 References: <1288119235-7036-1-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <20101027082958.GA6797@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101027090921.GB8554@pengutronix.de> <20101027102253.GA7822@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101027132213.GJ6017@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20101027132213.GJ6017@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 3031766976237448593 X-Ovh-Remote: 82.240.38.71 (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.50001/N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Le 27/10/2010 15:22, Sascha Hauer a écrit : > That's a way we can go but only if the common name is not MX5 or MX5x. > We've done it with the mx21/27 and it failed when the mx25 came out > which was completely incompatible. Since then everybody looking at > the code must know that mx2x is mx21/27 but not mx25. I suggest > something like MX513 instead. > MX513 is the partnumber of a member of the i.MX51 family so that's maybe not the best choice. http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=i.MX513 Eric