public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use pgd accessors when cloning a pgd range.
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:51:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC866B0.8000802@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC8649F.5060408@linux.intel.com>

 On 10/27/2010 10:42 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/27/2010 10:31 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>   On 10/27/2010 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2010 9:50 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This never used to be a problem.  Perhaps we can change how
>>>> clone_pgd_range is used at boot time to avoid it in the Xen case
>>>> (since
>>>> we don't care about the secondary pagetable)?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Xen shouldn't have any users of this, since it's used for low-level
>>> operations like SMP bootstrap, suspend to RAM, reboot and low-level
>>> BIOS functionality.
>>>
>>
>> Right, but it is being called smack in the middle of setup_arch().  It
>> looks like they could be hidden away in
>> native_pagetable_setup_start/done though.
>>
>
> This is what makes me absolutely hate paravirt with a passion...
> "let's hid things away in <obscure place> and make it absolutely
> impossible to either follow the code flow or figure out what the
> intended semantics are supposed to be."

Its not really an obscure place; it's where x86-32 does the rest of its
boot-time pagetable adjustments (like cleaning out the low identity
maps, etc).  Having those clone_pgd_ranges() floating around in
setup_arch() is out of place.

> (Let not even get me started on how ill-defined the semantics of some
> of the paravirt operations are.)  In this case, at the most you need a
> single flag of state... or you could even just ignore this low-level
> data structure that you will never use in the first place.  Ian's
> message just mentioned "a failure" and never described in any way what
> kind of "failure" it was.

It would be a pagefault from Xen preventing a direct write to the pgd
level of an active pagetable.  At the point in setup_arch() where it
does the first clone_pgd_range() we're already running on swapper_pg_dir
and the copy from initial_page_table is outright wrong.

As Ian suggests, we could switch Xen to use initial_page_table at boot
then move to swapper_pg_dir in the same way native does.

    J

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-27 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-27  8:50 [PATCH] x86: use pgd accessors when cloning a pgd range Ian Campbell
2010-10-27 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-27 16:50   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-27 17:18     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-27 17:31       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-27 17:42         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-27 17:51           ` Ian Campbell
2010-10-27 17:51           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2010-10-27 18:02             ` Ian Campbell
2010-10-27 18:11             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-27 18:51               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-27 19:00                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-27 19:02                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-27 17:44         ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-27 17:54           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-27 17:58           ` Ian Campbell
2010-10-28  9:23             ` Ian Campbell
2010-10-28 11:20               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-28 11:53                 ` Ian Campbell
2010-10-28 15:49                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-28 15:48               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-03 15:35               ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CC866B0.8000802@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox