From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use online node real index in calulate_tbl_offset()
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:02:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CCA3941.9060303@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CCA2F0C.7010302@kernel.org>
Shaohua, does this look right to you?
-hpa
On 10/28/2010 07:18 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> Found one numa system that doesn't have ram installed in first socket
> hang during executing init scripts.
>
> bisect to:
>
> |commit 932967202182743c01a2eee4bdfa2c42697bc586
> |Author: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> |Date: Wed Oct 20 11:07:03 2010 +0800
> |
> | x86: Spread tlb flush vector between nodes
>
> It turns out when first socket is not online could have cpus on node1
> tlb_offset set to bigger than NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS.
>
> that could affect systems like 4 sockets, but socket 2 doesn't
> have installed, sockets 3 will get too big tlb_offset.
>
> Need to use real online node idx.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struc
>
> static void __cpuinit calculate_tlb_offset(void)
> {
> - int cpu, node, nr_node_vecs;
> + int cpu, node, nr_node_vecs, idx = 0;
> /*
> * we are changing tlb_vector_offset for each CPU in runtime, but this
> * will not cause inconsistency, as the write is atomic under X86. we
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void __cpuinit calculate_tlb_offs
> nr_node_vecs = NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS/nr_online_nodes;
>
> for_each_online_node(node) {
> - int node_offset = (node % NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS) *
> + int node_offset = (idx % NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS) *
> nr_node_vecs;
> int cpu_offset = 0;
> for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node)) {
> @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static void __cpuinit calculate_tlb_offs
> cpu_offset++;
> cpu_offset = cpu_offset % nr_node_vecs;
> }
> + idx++;
> }
> }
>
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-29 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-29 2:18 [PATCH] x86: Use online node real index in calulate_tbl_offset() Yinghai Lu
2010-10-29 3:02 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-10-31 3:38 ` Shaohua Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-13 18:52 Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CCA3941.9060303@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox