* [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
@ 2010-11-04 17:48 Eric Dumazet
2010-11-04 18:05 ` Christoph Lameter
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-04 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: linux-kernel, Christoph Lameter, Ingo Molnar, Andi Kleen,
Tejun Heo, Thomas Gleixner
Use modern per_cpu API to increment {soft|hard}irq counters, and
use per_cpu allocation for (struct irq_desc)->kstats_irq instead of an
array.
This gives better SMP/NUMA locality and saves few instructions per irq.
With small nr_cpuids values (8 for example), kstats_irq was a small
array (less than L1_CACHE_BYTES), potentially source of false sharing.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/irqdesc.h | 2 +-
include/linux/kernel_stat.h | 21 ++++++++++-----------
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 16 +++++++++-------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
index 979c68c..6a64c6f 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct irq_desc {
#endif
struct timer_rand_state *timer_rand_state;
- unsigned int *kstat_irqs;
+ unsigned int __percpu *kstat_irqs;
irq_flow_handler_t handle_irq;
struct irqaction *action; /* IRQ action list */
unsigned int status; /* IRQ status */
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
index ad54c84..acd97a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct cpu_usage_stat {
struct kernel_stat {
struct cpu_usage_stat cpustat;
#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
- unsigned int irqs[NR_IRQS];
+ unsigned int irqs[NR_IRQS];
#endif
unsigned long irqs_sum;
unsigned int softirqs[NR_SOFTIRQS];
@@ -46,41 +46,40 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct kernel_stat, kstat);
extern unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void);
#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
-#define kstat_irqs_this_cpu(irq) \
- (kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq])
+#define kstat_irqs_this_cpu(irq) __this_cpu_read(kstat.irqs[irq])
struct irq_desc;
static inline void kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq,
struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
- kstat_this_cpu.irqs_sum++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs[irq]);
+ __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum);
}
static inline unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
{
- return kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq];
+ return kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq];
}
#else
#include <linux/irq.h>
extern unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu);
#define kstat_irqs_this_cpu(DESC) \
- ((DESC)->kstat_irqs[smp_processor_id()])
+ __this_cpu_read((DESC)->kstat_irqs)
#define kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irqno, DESC) do {\
- ((DESC)->kstat_irqs[smp_processor_id()]++);\
- kstat_this_cpu.irqs_sum++; } while (0)
+ __this_cpu_inc((DESC)->kstat_irqs);\
+ __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum); } while (0)
#endif
static inline void kstat_incr_softirqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq)
{
- kstat_this_cpu.softirqs[irq]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(kstat.softirqs[irq]);
}
static inline unsigned int kstat_softirqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
{
- return kstat_cpu(cpu).softirqs[irq];
+ return kstat_cpu(cpu).softirqs[irq];
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
index 9988d03..7683422 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ static inline int desc_node(struct irq_desc *desc) { return 0; }
static void desc_set_defaults(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int node)
{
+ int cpu;
+
desc->irq_data.irq = irq;
desc->irq_data.chip = &no_irq_chip;
desc->irq_data.chip_data = NULL;
@@ -83,7 +85,8 @@ static void desc_set_defaults(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int node)
desc->irq_count = 0;
desc->irqs_unhandled = 0;
desc->name = NULL;
- memset(desc->kstat_irqs, 0, nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(*(desc->kstat_irqs)));
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, cpu) = 0;
desc_smp_init(desc, node);
}
@@ -133,8 +136,7 @@ static struct irq_desc *alloc_desc(int irq, int node)
if (!desc)
return NULL;
/* allocate based on nr_cpu_ids */
- desc->kstat_irqs = kzalloc_node(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(*desc->kstat_irqs),
- gfp, node);
+ desc->kstat_irqs = alloc_percpu(unsigned int);
if (!desc->kstat_irqs)
goto err_desc;
@@ -149,7 +151,7 @@ static struct irq_desc *alloc_desc(int irq, int node)
return desc;
err_kstat:
- kfree(desc->kstat_irqs);
+ free_percpu(desc->kstat_irqs);
err_desc:
kfree(desc);
return NULL;
@@ -166,7 +168,7 @@ static void free_desc(unsigned int irq)
mutex_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
free_masks(desc);
- kfree(desc->kstat_irqs);
+ free_percpu(desc->kstat_irqs);
kfree(desc);
}
@@ -391,7 +393,7 @@ void dynamic_irq_cleanup(unsigned int irq)
unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
{
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
- return desc ? desc->kstat_irqs[cpu] : 0;
+ return desc ? *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, cpu) : 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
@@ -404,7 +406,7 @@ unsigned int kstat_irqs(unsigned int irq)
if (!desc)
return 0;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- sum += desc->kstat_irqs[cpu];
+ sum += *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, cpu);
return sum;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-04 17:48 [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs Eric Dumazet
@ 2010-11-04 18:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-04 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 8:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-05 16:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2010-11-04 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Andi Kleen, Tejun Heo,
Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> static inline unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
> {
> - return kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq];
> + return kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq];
> }
Whitespace fixes?
Looks ok otherwise.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-04 18:05 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2010-11-04 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-04 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Andi Kleen, Tejun Heo,
Thomas Gleixner
Le jeudi 04 novembre 2010 à 13:05 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > static inline unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
> > {
> > - return kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq];
> > + return kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq];
> > }
>
> Whitespace fixes?
>
> Looks ok otherwise.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Ah yes, some lines were beginning with seven spaces.
Thanks for the review !
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-04 17:48 [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs Eric Dumazet
2010-11-04 18:05 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2010-11-05 8:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-05 11:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 16:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-11-05 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Christoph Lameter, Ingo Molnar,
Andi Kleen, Thomas Gleixner
On 11/04/2010 06:48 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Use modern per_cpu API to increment {soft|hard}irq counters, and
> use per_cpu allocation for (struct irq_desc)->kstats_irq instead of an
> array.
>
> This gives better SMP/NUMA locality and saves few instructions per irq.
>
> With small nr_cpuids values (8 for example), kstats_irq was a small
> array (less than L1_CACHE_BYTES), potentially source of false sharing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Looks good to me although it would be nice to note the white space
fixes in the comment.
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-05 8:27 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2010-11-05 11:19 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-05 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Christoph Lameter, Ingo Molnar,
Andi Kleen, Thomas Gleixner
Le vendredi 05 novembre 2010 à 09:27 +0100, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> Looks good to me although it would be nice to note the white space
> fixes in the comment.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thanks !
I'll send a V2 anyway, without the white space fixes,
and with better support of !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-04 17:48 [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs Eric Dumazet
2010-11-04 18:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-05 8:27 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2010-11-05 16:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-05 16:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-05 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: linux-kernel, Christoph Lameter, Ingo Molnar, Andi Kleen,
Tejun Heo, Thomas Gleixner
Use modern per_cpu API to increment {soft|hard}irq counters, and
use per_cpu allocation for (struct irq_desc)->kstats_irq instead of an
array.
This gives better SMP/NUMA locality and saves few instructions per irq.
With small nr_cpuids values (8 for example), kstats_irq was a small
array (less than L1_CACHE_BYTES), potentially source of false sharing.
In the !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ case, remove the huge, NUMA/cache unfriendly
kstat_irqs_all[NR_IRQS][NR_CPUS] array.
Note : we still populate kstats_irq for all possible irqs in
early_irq_init(). We probably could use on-demand allocations.
(Code included in alloc_descs()).
Problem is not all IRQS are used with a prior alloc_descs() call.
kstat_irqs_this_cpu() is not used anymore, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V2: support for !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
No white space changes.
Question : Is dynamic percpu allocator ready at this stage for all
arches ? The need is NR_IRQS*4 bytes of percpu memory for
!CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
index 979c68c..6a64c6f 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct irq_desc {
#endif
struct timer_rand_state *timer_rand_state;
- unsigned int *kstat_irqs;
+ unsigned int __percpu *kstat_irqs;
irq_flow_handler_t handle_irq;
struct irqaction *action; /* IRQ action list */
unsigned int status; /* IRQ status */
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
index ad54c84..0cce2db 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
@@ -46,16 +46,14 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct kernel_stat, kstat);
extern unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void);
#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
-#define kstat_irqs_this_cpu(irq) \
- (kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq])
struct irq_desc;
static inline void kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq,
struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
- kstat_this_cpu.irqs_sum++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs[irq]);
+ __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum);
}
static inline unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
@@ -65,17 +63,18 @@ static inline unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
#else
#include <linux/irq.h>
extern unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu);
-#define kstat_irqs_this_cpu(DESC) \
- ((DESC)->kstat_irqs[smp_processor_id()])
-#define kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irqno, DESC) do {\
- ((DESC)->kstat_irqs[smp_processor_id()]++);\
- kstat_this_cpu.irqs_sum++; } while (0)
+
+#define kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irqno, DESC) \
+do { \
+ __this_cpu_inc(*(DESC)->kstat_irqs); \
+ __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum); \
+} while (0)
#endif
static inline void kstat_incr_softirqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq)
{
- kstat_this_cpu.softirqs[irq]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(kstat.softirqs[irq]);
}
static inline unsigned int kstat_softirqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
index 9988d03..a789a22 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ static inline int desc_node(struct irq_desc *desc) { return 0; }
static void desc_set_defaults(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int node)
{
+ int cpu;
+
desc->irq_data.irq = irq;
desc->irq_data.chip = &no_irq_chip;
desc->irq_data.chip_data = NULL;
@@ -83,7 +85,8 @@ static void desc_set_defaults(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int node)
desc->irq_count = 0;
desc->irqs_unhandled = 0;
desc->name = NULL;
- memset(desc->kstat_irqs, 0, nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(*(desc->kstat_irqs)));
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, cpu) = 0;
desc_smp_init(desc, node);
}
@@ -133,8 +136,7 @@ static struct irq_desc *alloc_desc(int irq, int node)
if (!desc)
return NULL;
/* allocate based on nr_cpu_ids */
- desc->kstat_irqs = kzalloc_node(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(*desc->kstat_irqs),
- gfp, node);
+ desc->kstat_irqs = alloc_percpu(unsigned int);
if (!desc->kstat_irqs)
goto err_desc;
@@ -149,7 +151,7 @@ static struct irq_desc *alloc_desc(int irq, int node)
return desc;
err_kstat:
- kfree(desc->kstat_irqs);
+ free_percpu(desc->kstat_irqs);
err_desc:
kfree(desc);
return NULL;
@@ -166,7 +168,7 @@ static void free_desc(unsigned int irq)
mutex_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
free_masks(desc);
- kfree(desc->kstat_irqs);
+ free_percpu(desc->kstat_irqs);
kfree(desc);
}
@@ -234,7 +236,6 @@ struct irq_desc irq_desc[NR_IRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = {
}
};
-static unsigned int kstat_irqs_all[NR_IRQS][NR_CPUS];
int __init early_irq_init(void)
{
int count, i, node = first_online_node;
@@ -250,7 +251,8 @@ int __init early_irq_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
desc[i].irq_data.irq = i;
desc[i].irq_data.chip = &no_irq_chip;
- desc[i].kstat_irqs = kstat_irqs_all[i];
+ /* TODO : do this allocation on-demand ... */
+ desc[i].kstat_irqs = alloc_percpu(unsigned int);
alloc_masks(desc + i, GFP_KERNEL, node);
desc_smp_init(desc + i, node);
lockdep_set_class(&desc[i].lock, &irq_desc_lock_class);
@@ -275,6 +277,22 @@ static void free_desc(unsigned int irq)
static inline int alloc_descs(unsigned int start, unsigned int cnt, int node)
{
+#if defined(CONFIG_KSTAT_IRQS_ONDEMAND)
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
+ desc = irq_to_desc(start + i);
+ if (desc && !desc->kstat_irqs) {
+ unsigned int __percpu *stats = alloc_percpu(unsigned int);
+
+ if (!stats)
+ return -1;
+ if (cmpxchg(&desc->kstat_irqs, NULL, stats) != NULL)
+ free_percpu(stats);
+ }
+ }
+#endif
return start;
}
#endif /* !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ */
@@ -391,7 +409,9 @@ void dynamic_irq_cleanup(unsigned int irq)
unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
{
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
- return desc ? desc->kstat_irqs[cpu] : 0;
+
+ return desc && desc->kstat_irqs ?
+ *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, cpu) : 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
@@ -401,10 +421,10 @@ unsigned int kstat_irqs(unsigned int irq)
int cpu;
int sum = 0;
- if (!desc)
+ if (!desc || !desc->kstat_irqs)
return 0;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- sum += desc->kstat_irqs[cpu];
+ sum += *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, cpu);
return sum;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-05 16:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
@ 2010-11-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-05 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 16:54 ` Christoph Lameter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-11-05 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Christoph Lameter, Ingo Molnar,
Andi Kleen, Thomas Gleixner
Hello,
On 11/05/2010 05:06 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> V2: support for !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> No white space changes.
>
> Question : Is dynamic percpu allocator ready at this stage for all
> arches ? The need is NR_IRQS*4 bytes of percpu memory for
> !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
The earliest is early_irq_init(), right? If so, percpu allocator is
up by then on all archs.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2010-11-05 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-05 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Christoph Lameter, Ingo Molnar,
Andi Kleen, Thomas Gleixner
Le vendredi 05 novembre 2010 à 17:45 +0100, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On 11/05/2010 05:06 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > V2: support for !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> > No white space changes.
> >
> > Question : Is dynamic percpu allocator ready at this stage for all
> > arches ? The need is NR_IRQS*4 bytes of percpu memory for
> > !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
>
> The earliest is early_irq_init(), right? If so, percpu allocator is
> up by then on all archs.
>
OK thats fine then.
Thanks for the clarification Tejun.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-05 16:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2010-11-05 16:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-05 17:16 ` Eric Dumazet
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2010-11-05 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Andi Kleen, Tejun Heo,
Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> static inline void kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc)
desc is not used.
> {
> - kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
> - kstat_this_cpu.irqs_sum++;
> + __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs[irq]);
> + __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
2010-11-05 16:54 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2010-11-05 17:16 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-11-05 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Andi Kleen, Tejun Heo,
Thomas Gleixner
Le vendredi 05 novembre 2010 à 11:54 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > static inline void kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq,
> > struct irq_desc *desc)
>
> desc is not used.
>
> > {
> > - kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
> > - kstat_this_cpu.irqs_sum++;
> > + __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs[irq]);
> > + __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum);
> > }
>
Thats right, but it is used in CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS case.
Prototype of this function is generic, I did not change this.
(I left the macro in CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS case too because I felt
using a function could break some arches)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-05 17:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-04 17:48 [PATCH] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs Eric Dumazet
2010-11-04 18:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-04 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 8:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-05 11:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 16:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-05 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-05 16:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-05 17:16 ` Eric Dumazet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox