Re: [PATCH] x86: fix apic.h unused but set warnings

[Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>]

On 11/8/2010 8:36 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> [Andrew, can you please put this in your tree for submission.
>> This was submitted some time ago, but x86@ is a blackhole unfortunately and
> You are about to create a blackhole by earning yourself an entry in my
> killfile. I'm really fed up with your sneaky and priggish attacks.

Hi Thomas,

It's unfortunately not the only patch to which this happened. Losing patches
is very common for x86@ based on my experience, the rate seems to be far
far above 50%, more often even higher. I don't know what the problem
is either, but it's very visible to me.

I would certainly not make such a comment without having
sufficient data to back it up.

In fact I don't ping most patches, but had to do it for this one
because the problem is just too noticeable.

Anyways it's easy to avoid such comments too: don't lose patches as often
I would be happy if I didn't need to send any of these reminders. However
at this loss rate you cannot expect nice comments.

-Andi