From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: Hide OPP configuration when SoCs do not provide an implementation
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:04:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD99B31.7020505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289327056-27950-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Mark Brown had written, on 11/09/2010 12:24 PM, the following:
> Since the OPP API is only useful with an appropraite SoC-specific
> implementation there is no point in offering the ability to enable
> the API on general systems. Provide an ARCH_HAS OPP Kconfig symbol
> which masks out the option unless selected by an implementation.
Thanks. yep, this is a good change to have.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> ---
> Documentation/power/opp.txt | 3 +++
> kernel/power/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/power/opp.txt b/Documentation/power/opp.txt
> index 44d87ad..cd44558 100644
> --- a/Documentation/power/opp.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/power/opp.txt
> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ Typical usage of the OPP library is as follows:
> SoC framework -> modifies on required cases certain OPPs -> OPP layer
> -> queries to search/retrieve information ->
>
> +Architectures that provide a SoC framework for OPP should select ARCH_HAS_OPP
> +to make the OPP layer available.
> +
> OPP layer expects each domain to be represented by a unique device pointer. SoC
> framework registers a set of initial OPPs per device with the OPP layer. This
> list is expected to be an optimally small number typically around 5 per device.
> diff --git a/kernel/power/Kconfig b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> index 29bff61..a5aff3e 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
> @@ -246,9 +246,13 @@ config PM_OPS
> depends on PM_SLEEP || PM_RUNTIME
> default y
>
> +config ARCH_HAS_OPP
> + bool
> +
> config PM_OPP
> bool "Operating Performance Point (OPP) Layer library"
> depends on PM
> + depends on ARCH_HAS_OPP
> ---help---
> SOCs have a standard set of tuples consisting of frequency and
> voltage pairs that the device will support per voltage domain. This
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 18:24 [PATCH] PM: Hide OPP configuration when SoCs do not provide an implementation Mark Brown
2010-11-09 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2010-11-09 19:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-11-11 0:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD99B31.7020505@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox