From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: more fixes and cleanup to AMD Fam10 MMCONF enabling
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:22:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDAF0D8.1000100@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD7BD310200007800020E13@vpn.id2.novell.com>
On 11/08/2010 12:04 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 05.11.10 at 18:51, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On 11/05/2010 03:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Unfortunately it turned out the original code had more issues: We want
>>> to place the region above 4G in any case (even if TOM2 isn't enabled
>>> or invalid), and the base mask definition was improperly typed (thus
>>> causing shifts by FAM10H_MMIO_CONF_BASE_SHIFT to produce other than
>>> the intended result). Fixing this in turn allowed simplifying the MMIO
>>> region detection code, as regions ending below TOM2 now aren't of
>>> interest anymore.
>>>
>>> This will only apply cleanly on top of yesterday's patch titled
>>> "x86-64: fix and clean up AMD Fam10 MMCONF enabling".
>>
>> I don't think we have systems that have Enable bit set, but TOM2 < 4G.
>
> I suppose that's true, but making the kernel independent of
> BIOS flaws (especially when it's that cheap) seems like a good
> idea to me. But of course, if that's what would be hindering
> acceptance of the patch, I'd re-submit with that part dropped.
I'm ok with your change.
Please come out one updated version with meaningful MACRO.
Thanks
Yinghai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-05 10:59 [PATCH] x86-64: more fixes and cleanup to AMD Fam10 MMCONF enabling Jan Beulich
2010-11-05 13:07 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-11-05 13:13 ` Jan Beulich
2010-11-05 17:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-08 8:04 ` Jan Beulich
2010-11-10 19:22 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-11-08 16:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-08 16:43 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDAF0D8.1000100@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox