public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (applesmc) Fix checkpatch errors
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:56:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDAF8E4.7030609@euromail.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101110193930.GA31650@ericsson.com>

>>> @@ -977,7 +975,11 @@ static ssize_t applesmc_key_at_index_show

>>>  static ssize_t applesmc_key_at_index_store(struct device *dev,
>>>  	struct device_attribute *attr, const char *sysfsbuf, size_t count)
>>>  {
>>> -	key_at_index = simple_strtoul(sysfsbuf, NULL, 10);
>>> +	unsigned long newkey;
>>> +
>>> +	if (strict_strtoul(sysfsbuf, 10, &newkey) < 0)
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +	key_at_index = newkey;
>>
>>
>> Crash alert - key_at_index is not range checked, and the remake uses this value
>> as an array index...
>>
> Good that I made this change ;). I'll add the check and re-send.


Indeed! The downside of remakes... sorry about that. :-)

I guess the change should go into patch 4 already? There is also the option to
put the bounds check in applesmc_get_entry_by_index, but I like the simplicity
of "|| newkey >= smcreg.key_count".

> This points to another problem, though. You allocate key_count entries,
> ie cache[0]..cache[key_count-1]. Yet, the key searches are from 0..key_count,
> ie span key_count+1 entries. Is that another problem ?

>

> Seems to me you would either have to allocate key_count+1 entries, or terminate
> the search at key_count - 1. Not sure which one would be correct. Let me know,
> and I'll update the affected patch(es).


If you are referring to the lower and upper bound functions, those use the
one-past-the-last-element convention, so it is actually still 0..key_count - 1.
I stayed very close to the stl reference implementation, which relies on the
fact that when begin != end, (begin + (end - begin) / 2) < end.

Cheers,
Henrik

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-10 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-10 18:53 [PATCH] hwmon: (applesmc) Fix checkpatch errors Guenter Roeck
2010-11-10 18:52 ` Henrik Rydberg
2010-11-10 19:39   ` Guenter Roeck
2010-11-10 19:56     ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2010-11-10 20:12       ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CDAF8E4.7030609@euromail.se \
    --to=rydberg@euromail.se \
    --cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox