2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?

2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

I'm curious, any plans for an rt patch for current kernels? Anything in 
the works? 2.6.33.x is getting to be really old... the question keeps 
popping up but I have heard nothing from the rt gurus...

-- Fernando "ready to test"

Re: 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:

> I'm curious, any plans for an rt patch for current kernels? Anything in the
> works? 2.6.33.x is getting to be really old... the question keeps popping up
> but I have heard nothing from the rt gurus...

Working on it :)

Re: 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?

[Niccolò Belli]

Il 10/11/2010 21:54, Thomas Gleixner ha scritto:
> Working on it :)

Glad to hear that, I can't use 2.6.33-rt anymore because of problems
with my intel video card and my band is starting to blame because of xruns.

Darkbasic

Re: 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?

[Ng Oon-Ee]

On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 15:56 +0100, Niccolò Belli wrote:
> Il 10/11/2010 21:54, Thomas Gleixner ha scritto:
> > Working on it :)
> 
> Glad to hear that, I can't use 2.6.33-rt anymore because of problems
> with my intel video card and my band is starting to blame because of xruns.
> 
> Darkbasic

In the meantime, the -bfs kernel does improve the situation somewhat.

Re: 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?

[Bernardo Barros]

I'm trying to install the 2.6.36-bfs here, let's see what happens.. :-)

2010/11/11 Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 15:56 +0100, Niccolò Belli wrote:
>> Il 10/11/2010 21:54, Thomas Gleixner ha scritto:
>> > Working on it :)
>>
>> Glad to hear that, I can't use 2.6.33-rt anymore because of problems
>> with my intel video card and my band is starting to blame because of xruns.
>>
>> Darkbasic
>
> In the meantime, the -bfs kernel does improve the situation somewhat.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Re: 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?

[jordan]

hehehe,

> I'm trying to install the 2.6.36-bfs here, let's see what happens.. :-)

i know what happens at my end. - i can use 2.6.36 for RT type tasks,
as i set that kernel up 2 days ago.
im still holding onto 2.6.35 though, as it is my best kernel, has my
Wacom running, and rgba.
So far though, 2.6.36 seems not too much different from 2.6.35 for my
pro-audio usage.
I may wait for 2.6.37-bfs before i re-install Wacom, rgba, etc.

(or PREEMPT_RT, once i actually here of a patch being available, i hope soonish)

BFS is good enough for now though.

jordan

Re: 2.6.3x-rty where x > 3 and y >= 1?

[Niccolò Belli]

Il 11/11/2010 23:49, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
>> Glad to hear that, I can't use 2.6.33-rt anymore because of problems
>> with my intel video card and my band is starting to blame because of xruns.
>>
>> Darkbasic
> 
> In the meantime, the -bfs kernel does improve the situation somewhat.

I just compiled 2.6.36-bfs, but unfortunately alsa git does not compile
against it (I need alsa git because of M-Audio Fast Track Ultra support).

Darkbasic