From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754679Ab0KKTZU (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:25:20 -0500 Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:46165 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754470Ab0KKTZT (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:25:19 -0500 Message-ID: <4CDC431E.7080005@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:25:18 -0800 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel Subject: Difference between VMSPLIT_2G_OPT and VMSPLIT_2G ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I tried compiling 2.6.37-rc1 with VMSPLIT_2G_OPT, but it seems I'm still limitted to < 1G of low-memory. There's no real help for either this or VMSPLIT_2G. Should I be seeing more low-memory in /proc/meminfo with one of these enabled? -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com