public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 4/9] x86: Initialize 32bit logical apicid mapping early during boot
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:58:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDD0FD0.1020807@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDD0B1F.4060701@kernel.org>

On 11/12/2010 01:38 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On x86_32, non-standard logical apicid mapping can be used by
> different NUMA setups and the mapping is queried while bringing up
> each CPU using apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() to build
> cpu_2_logical_apicid[] array.  The logical apicid is then used to
> deliver IPIs and determine NUMA configuration.
> 
> Unfortunately, initializing at SMP bring up is too late for percpu
> setup making static percpu variables setup w/o considering NUMA.  This
> also is different from how x86_64 is configured making the code
> difficult to follow and maintain.
> 
> This patch updates logical apicid mapping handling such that,
> 
> * early_percpu variable x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid replaces
>   cpu_2_logical_apicid[].
> 
> * apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() is called once during get_smp_config()
>   and the output is recorded in x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid.
> 
> * apic->cpu_to_logical_apicid() is allowed to return BAD_APICID if it
>   can't determine the value that early during boot.  In this case, the
>   mapping will be initialized during SMP bring up by reading APIC LDR
>   as before.
> 
> - Brian Gerst spotted that setup_per_cpu_areas() was not copying the
>   early x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid to the permanent percpu area and
>   es7000_32 is using per_cpu() instead of early_per_cpu(), which in
>   itself is not incorrect as they're never used before setup_per_cpu()
>   but still confusing.  Both updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
> ---
> Updated as per Brian's comment.  The rest of the patchset apply okay
> on top of this change.  The git tree is updated accordingly.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h      |   18 +++++++++++++-----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h       |    3 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c      |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/bigsmp_32.c |   26 ++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/es7000_32.c |   27 ++++++++++-----------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c       |    8 ++++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c  |   15 +++++++--------
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/summit_32.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c   |    7 +++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c        |   10 +++-------
>  10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: work/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ work/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -1202,6 +1207,7 @@ static void __cpuinit lapic_setup_esr(vo
>   */
>  void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
>  {
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	unsigned int value, queued;
>  	int i, j, acked = 0;
>  	unsigned long long tsc = 0, ntsc;
> @@ -1343,21 +1362,19 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
>  	 * TODO: set up through-local-APIC from through-I/O-APIC? --macro
>  	 */
>  	value = apic_read(APIC_LVT0) & APIC_LVT_MASKED;
> -	if (!smp_processor_id() && (pic_mode || !value)) {
> +	if (!cpu && (pic_mode || !value)) {
>  		value = APIC_DM_EXTINT;
> -		apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "enabled ExtINT on CPU#%d\n",
> -				smp_processor_id());
> +		apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "enabled ExtINT on CPU#%d\n", cpu);
>  	} else {
>  		value = APIC_DM_EXTINT | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
> -		apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "masked ExtINT on CPU#%d\n",
> -				smp_processor_id());
> +		apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "masked ExtINT on CPU#%d\n", cpu);
>  	}
>  	apic_write(APIC_LVT0, value);
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * only the BP should see the LINT1 NMI signal, obviously.
>  	 */
> -	if (!smp_processor_id())
> +	if (!cpu)
>  		value = APIC_DM_NMI;
>  	else
>  		value = APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
> @@ -1369,7 +1386,7 @@ void __cpuinit setup_local_APIC(void)
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL
>  	/* Recheck CMCI information after local APIC is up on CPU #0 */
> -	if (smp_processor_id() == 0)
> +	if (cpu == 0)
>  		cmci_recheck();
>  #endif
>  }

those replacing smp_processor_id() with cpu should be in another patch.

Thanks

	Yinghai

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-12 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-11 11:02 [PATCHSET RFC] x86: unify x86_32 and 64 NUMA init paths Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86: Kill unused static boot_cpu_logical_apicid in smpboot.c Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 11:13   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86: Rename x86_32 MAX_APICID to MAX_LOCAL_APIC Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 11:15   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86: Make default_send_IPI_mask_sequence/allbutself_logical() 32bit only Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 12:02   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-11 16:18   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-11 17:34   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 17:52     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86: Initialize 32bit logical apicid mapping early during boot Tejun Heo
2010-11-12  1:54   ` Brian Gerst
2010-11-12  9:38   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-11-12  9:58     ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-11-12 10:22       ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-12 10:33   ` [PATCH 4/9 UPDATED-1] " Tejun Heo
2010-11-18  8:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-18  8:39       ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-18  8:42         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-18  8:48           ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-18  9:08             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86: Replace apic->apicid_to_node() with ->numa_cpu_node() Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 11:37   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 12:01   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86: Unify CPU -> " Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling " Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 12:11   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: Unify NUMA initialization " Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 12:09   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-12 10:32 ` [PATCH 3.5/9] x86: Use local variable to cache smp_processor_id() in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CDD0FD0.1020807@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox