From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: MMU: retry #PF for softmmu
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:25:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE0C45C.809@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CDFBE00.2000802@redhat.com>
On 11/14/2010 06:46 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 08:50 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Retry #PF for softmmu only when the current vcpu has the same
>> root shadow page as the time when #PF occurs. it means they
>> have same paging environment
>>
>
Hi Avi,
Thanks for your review.
> The process could have been killed and replaced by another using the
> same cr3.
Yeah, this 'retry' is unnecessary if the process is killed, but this
case is infrequent, the most case is the process keeps running and try
to access the fault address later.
And, we can get few advantages even if the process have been killed,
since we can fix the page mapping for the other processes which have
the same CR3, if other process accessed the fault address, the #PF
can be avoid. (of course we can't speculate other process can access
the fault address later)
After all, this is a speculate path, i thinks it can work well in most
case. :-)
> Or we may be running a guest that uses the same cr3 for all
> processes.
We can allow to retry #PF in the same CR3 even if there are the different
processes, since these processes have the same page mapping, the later #PF
can avoid if the page mapping have been fixed.
> Or another thread may have mmap()ed something else over the
> same address.
The mmap virtual address is also visible for other threads since the threads
have the same page table, so i think this case is the same as above?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-15 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-12 6:46 [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: MMU: fix missing post sync audit Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-12 6:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: MMU: clear apfs if page state is changed Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-12 6:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: MMU: support apf for nonpaing guest Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-12 6:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: MMU: fix apf prefault if nested guest is enabled Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-12 6:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: MMU: retry #PF for softmmu Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-14 10:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-15 5:25 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-11-15 9:30 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-15 9:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-15 9:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-11-15 9:59 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-15 10:12 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CE0C45C.809@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox