From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756522Ab0KON1d (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:27:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46208 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754535Ab0KON1c (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:27:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4CE13539.1020106@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:27:21 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Kent CC: Arnd Bergmann , autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: autofs4 hang in 2.6.37-rc1 References: <4CDFDC2B.6040205@redhat.com> <4CE00194.3070601@redhat.com> <1289785533.3248.18.camel@localhost> <201011150954.34289.arnd@arndb.de> <1289827341.3248.49.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1289827341.3248.49.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/15/2010 03:22 PM, Ian Kent wrote: > > Ian, if you can prove that the lock is not needed, I think we shold > > just remove it. > > I don't think I can prove it but I will have a long look at the code. > I don't think it is needed and I expect I'll recommend it be removed. I've been running with the lock removed for a while with no ill effect. Of course it doesn't prove anything but at least it's a workaround for me. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function