From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
davem@davemloft.net, deller@gmx.de, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
hpa@zytor.com, jejb@parisc-linux.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca,
mingo@elte.hu, roland@redhat.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: Re: + exec_domain-establish-a-linux32-domain-on-config_compat-systems.patc h added to -mm tree
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:57:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE182A2.1020606@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101113171722.GA2956@redhat.com>
On 11/13/2010 09:17 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/12, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> From: David Daney<ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
>>
>> If PER_LINUX32 is set calling sys_personality, we will try to find the
>> corresponding exec_domain. This causes us to try to load a module for
>> personality-8. After running the userspace module loader and failing to
>> find the module, we fall back to the default.
>
> Cough. It is not easy to me comment this patch ;)
>
> Personally, I think this change is fine. But, despite the fact
> the code in exec_domain.c is very trivial, I was never able to really
> understand its rationality. And the usage of ->personality has some
> oddities.
>
> In particular, I can't parse default_exec_domain() at all. And,
> what exec_domain->handler() actually does? I do not see anything
> in arch/ which uses EXEC_DOMAIN offsets.
>
> Perhaps someone from CC can explain this?
>
>
>> We can avoid the failed module loading overhead by building-in the
>> linux32_exec_domain for systems that have CONFIG_COMPAT.
>
> Indeed. But at the same time this means it is not possible to use
> personality-8.ko if the system has it.
Well in the same way it is not possible to use personality-0.ko
(PER_LINUX) because it is just as built-in.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I have no idea why anyone could want this module,
> just I am a bit worried.
If the personality is built-in, then I don't see how it makes any sense
to attempt to override it with an externally supplied version. If you
want set a domain for PER_LINUX32, don't configure you system to supply
a default version.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +static struct exec_domain linux32_exec_domain = {
>> + .name = "Linux32", /* name */
>> + .handler = default_handler, /* lcall7 causes a seg fault. */
>> + .pers_low = PER_LINUX32,
>> + .pers_high = PER_LINUX32,
>> + .signal_map = ident_map, /* Identity map signals. */
>> + .signal_invmap = ident_map, /* - both ways. */
>> +};
>> +#endif
>> +
>> struct exec_domain default_exec_domain = {
>> .name = "Linux", /* name */
>> .handler = default_handler, /* lcall7 causes a seg fault. */
>> @@ -41,6 +52,9 @@ struct exec_domain default_exec_domain =
>> .pers_high = 0, /* PER_LINUX personality. */
>> .signal_map = ident_map, /* Identity map signals. */
>> .signal_invmap = ident_map, /* - both ways. */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> + .next =&linux32_exec_domain,
>> +#endif
>> };
>
> OK, but please look at arch/s390/kernel/compat_exec_domain.c and
> arch/ia64/mm/init.c, they also register PER_LINUX32 domain, not
> good. And note that register_exec_domain() doesn't check
> pers_low/high, this means linux32_exec_domain can silently supress
> s390_exec_domain/ia32_exec_domain.
>
Ah, I had not known about this. The comments in arch/ia64/mm/init.c
mirror my reason for creating the patch.
I think the s390 and ia64 definitions will conflict with the #ifdef
CONFIG_COMPAT in my patch. I will attempt to correct this in a new
version of the patch.
Thanks for looking at this,
David Daney
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-15 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201011122022.oACKM6HH029696@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2010-11-13 17:17 ` + exec_domain-establish-a-linux32-domain-on-config_compat-systems.patc h added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-15 18:57 ` David Daney [this message]
2010-11-15 19:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CE182A2.1020606@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox