public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	ying.huang@intel.com, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 0/6] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:24:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE5A7AE.8070703@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101118221554.GA31253@lenovo>

On 11/18/2010 04:15 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:56:50AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> ...
>   
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c |   21 ++++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
>> =====================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
>> @@ -753,19 +753,22 @@ out:
>>  
>>  static inline int p4_pmu_clear_cccr_ovf(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
>>  {
>> -	int overflow = 0;
>> -	u32 low, high;
>> +	u32 overflow = 0;
>> +	u32 low, low_cccr, high;
>>  
>> -	rdmsr(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, low, high);
>> +	/* an official way for overflow indication */
>> +	rdmsr(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, low_cccr, high);
>> +	overflow |= (low_cccr & P4_CCCR_OVF);
>> +
>> +	/* unflagged overflows */
>> +	rdmsr(hwc->event_base + hwc->idx, low, high);
>> +	overflow |= high & 0x80000000;
>>  
>> -	/* we need to check high bit for unflagged overflows */
>> -	if ((low & P4_CCCR_OVF) || !(high & (1 << 31))) {
>> -		overflow = 1;
>> +	if (overflow)
>>     
>
> this should be rather 'if (low_cccr & P4_CCCR_OVF)' otherwise
> redundant checking_wrmsrl called, updated patch below
>
> /me seems should not touch code at all today 
> ---
>
> perf, x86: P4 PMU - Fix unflagged overflows handling
>
> Jason pointed out that kgdb no longer works with new
> nmi-watchdog. Don found the reason -- P4 PMU reads CCCR
> register instead of counter itself, it forces NMIs to
> be eaten by perf subsystem.
>
> Fix it by reading a proper register.
>
> v2: Call checking_wrmsrl only if needed
>
> Reported-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
> Reported-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> ---
>
> Jason I've removed your Tested-by because the patch differ a bit
>
>   

It is retested and confirmed to work on real HW.   This no longer works
on qemu/kvm likely because the emulation is incorrect.

Thanks,
Jason.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-18 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-12 14:43 [V2 PATCH 0/6] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86, NMI: Add NMI symbol constants and rename memory parity to PCI SERR Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86, NMI: Add touch_nmi_watchdog to io_check_error delay Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86, NMI: Rewrite NMI handler Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86, NMI: Remove DIE_NMI_IPI and add priorties to handlers Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86, NMI: Allow NMI reason io port (0x61) to be processed on any CPU Don Zickus
2010-11-12 14:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86, NMI: Remove do_nmi_callback logic Don Zickus
2010-11-12 15:05 ` [V2 PATCH 0/6] x86, NMI: give NMI handler a face-lift Jason Wessel
2010-11-12 15:42   ` Don Zickus
2010-11-12 15:55     ` Jason Wessel
2010-11-12 16:11       ` Don Zickus
2010-11-12 16:34         ` Jason Wessel
2010-11-12 17:27           ` Don Zickus
2010-11-16 18:43             ` Don Zickus
2010-11-16 20:04               ` Jason Wessel
2010-11-18  8:05                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-18 12:47                   ` Jason Wessel
2010-11-18 13:17                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 14:32                       ` Don Zickus
2010-11-18 15:18                         ` Jason Wessel
2010-11-18 15:38                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 19:32                       ` Don Zickus
2010-11-18 19:51                         ` Jason Wessel
2010-11-18 20:04                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 20:08                           ` Don Zickus
2010-11-18 20:11                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 20:52                               ` Don Zickus
2010-11-18 21:01                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 21:16                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-11-18 21:26                                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 20:28                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 20:39                               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 21:02                                 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-18 21:19                                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 20:30                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-19 16:59                               ` Don Zickus
2010-11-19 18:25                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-19 22:59                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-11-19 23:09                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-19 23:30                                       ` Jason Wessel
2010-11-22 14:22                                         ` Don Zickus
2010-11-22 14:22                                       ` Don Zickus
2010-11-22 14:29                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-18 20:04                         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 21:56                         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 21:58                           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 22:15                           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-11-18 22:24                             ` Jason Wessel [this message]
2010-11-18 22:27                               ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CE5A7AE.8070703@windriver.com \
    --to=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox