From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760920Ab0KRXsG (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:48:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:40479 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755398Ab0KRXsE (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:48:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cIIXnp8NMGKZ2kDDfh/OdkKtu7tanVRPw22tdtq64U965uDhYvdothcF0GGVt+V3A2 7C4wsKd5h8WXDwhM8AdjjZNXe1ZKENiNW3ij7ZGkxrVoM4VGpw/QXHYH774fcUFPks9y LtTRHuttuR7v7SonG4wgHElOP6Tt3Iz+T5+Ss= Message-ID: <4CE5BB30.5080209@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:48:00 -0800 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick McHardy CC: David Miller , randy.dunlap@oracle.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, horms@verge.net.au, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: error while building the kernel Mainline References: <20101118.125451.98885354.davem@davemloft.net> <20101118130318.073f6beb.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20101118.131004.58430322.davem@davemloft.net> <20101118.131527.45904827.davem@davemloft.net> <4CE59F3F.3080407@trash.net> In-Reply-To: <4CE59F3F.3080407@trash.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/18/2010 01:48 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Am 18.11.2010 22:15, schrieb David Miller: >> From: David Miller >> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:10:04 -0800 (PST) >> >>> From: Randy Dunlap >>> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:03:18 -0800 >>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:54:51 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Patrick McHardy >>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:32:11 +0100 >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for testing. Dave, please apply directly, thanks! >>>> >>>> Dave, >>>> >>>> This patch does not fix the config/build error that I posted for linux-next. >>> >>> And it has bugs, now when NF_CONNTRACT is set to "m" IPVS isn't offered >>> at all. >>> >>> So I'm reverting. >> >> Ignore this, I was looking for "*_IPVS" in the config instead of >> "*_IP_VS" for some stupid reason. > > I always make the same mistake :) > >> Patch is sane and I'll look into Randy's problem when I get a chance. >> :-) > > I've already asked the tproxy guys to look into this, it's a > different problem that requires more tproxy knowledge than > have. > go outside to clean the garage, and put up the christmas lights up, come back and am freaking for a second that the problems not fixed... tripping me out man!! Justin P. Mattock