Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation

Matthew Wilcox
2010-11-18T13:06:33Z

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:36:48AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> There was concern that FITRIM ioctl is not common enough to be included
> in core vfs ioctl, as Christoph Hellwig pointed out there's no real point
> in dispatching this out to a separate vector instead of just through
> ->ioctl.

Um, are you and Josef working independently of each other? You don't
seem to be cc'ing each other on your patches, and you're basically doing
the same thing.

--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."