From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Cc: Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.37-rc2 breaks i915 graphics
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:34:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CEFB76F.9020902@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101126102341.6d4188af@schatten.dmk.lab>
Dne 26.11.2010 10:23, Florian Mickler napsal(a):
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:34:23 +0000
> Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:30:43 +0000
>> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:23:44 +0000, Chris Vine
>>> <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> With kernel 2.6.37-rc2, i915 graphics usually fails on boot-up after
>>>> modesetting with my Lenovo S12 netbook which uses the Intel 945GME
>>>> Express Integrated Graphics Controller. It displays up to the
>>>> point at which modesetting takes place and then usually goes blank.
>>>>
>>>> There may be some kind of race at work here: first, sometimes
>>>> (maybe 1 times in 4) graphics comes up correctly on a first cold
>>>> boot, but I have never managed to get it to come up on a warm
>>>> reboot. Secondly, graphics can be restored when I know (but cannot
>>>> see) that boot-up has concluded, simply by suspending the laptop
>>>> and then resuming. Resuming the laptop after a suspend always
>>>> brings up the graphics correctly.
>>>
>>> Add drm.debug=0xe to your boot commandline and compare if there is any
>>> difference between a successful cold boot, a broken cold boot and a
>>> warm boot. Similarly, comparing the output of intel_reg_dumper after
>>> each should yield a few clues as to what stage in the boot process we
>>> fail. -Chris
>>
>> First an additional datum point: 2.6.37-rc1 works normally, so the bug
>> is something introduced between 2.6.37-rc1 and 2.6.37-rc2 (to that
>> extent it may be related to this bug which reports a similar phenomenon:
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/21/23 ).
>>
>> Attached is the dmesg output from a successful cold boot with
>> 2.6.37-rc2, an unsuccessful cold boot and an unsuccessful warm boot,
>> each with drm.debug=0xe.
>>
>
> I trimmed the failure boot logs to the stuff before suspending, in
> order to only compare the boot sequence.
>
> Looks like only in failure case there are "pipe b
> underrun" reported...
> In success case, no "pipe b underrun" is reported.
>
> Also in success case connectors are probed much more often:
>
> $ grep drm:drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes dmesg-2.6.37-rc2.succeed | wc -l
> 76
> $ grep drm:drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes dmesg-2.6.37-rc2.*.fail | wc -l
> 32
> $ grep drm:drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes dmesg-2.6.37-rc2.cold.fail | wc -l
> 16
>
>
> I could not spot any other differences both failure modes have in common against the success case.
>
> If Chris (Wilson) doesn't yet know what could be the bug a bisection
> between 2.6.37-rc1 and rc2 might be helpful.
>
>
>> I can't provide the output of intel_reg_dumper: I can't compile the
>> latest intel-gpu-tools from git (missing declaration/definition of
>> I915_EXE_BLT). Probably something in a relevant library is too old.
>>
Reminds me - I need to keep drm_kms_helper disabled for reliable
resume on T61:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19052
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617809
Zdenek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 10:23 kernel 2.6.37-rc2 breaks i915 graphics Chris Vine
2010-11-21 10:30 ` Chris Wilson
2010-11-21 18:34 ` Chris Vine
2010-11-22 8:36 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-26 9:23 ` Florian Mickler
2010-11-26 13:34 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CEFB76F.9020902@redhat.com \
--to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox