From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755595Ab0LDT3M (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:29:12 -0500 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:49568 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751290Ab0LDT3M (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:29:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4CFA9685.20200@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 21:29:09 +0200 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [rfc: cpuops adv V1 0/8] Cmpxchg and xchg support for cpu ops References: <20101202215340.562309713@linux.com> In-Reply-To: <20101202215340.562309713@linux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, [ Sorry for the delay everyone. ] Christoph, do you mind sending me a series that you think is stable enough for linux-next? The numbers are pretty impressive and I'd love to give them some testing locally and in linux-next. How should we coordinate the per-CPU ops patches, btw? We had pretty good experience with the per-cpu allocator patches where Tejun merged the patches in his tree and I pulled it in slab.git. Who handles the per-cpu ops? Pekka