From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755616Ab0LDTb5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:31:57 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:54555 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755272Ab0LDTb4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:31:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4CFA970D.1080400@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:31:25 +0100 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pekka Enberg CC: Christoph Lameter , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [rfc: cpuops adv V1 0/8] Cmpxchg and xchg support for cpu ops References: <20101202215340.562309713@linux.com> <4CFA9685.20200@cs.helsinki.fi> In-Reply-To: <4CFA9685.20200@cs.helsinki.fi> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 12/04/2010 08:29 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > [ Sorry for the delay everyone. ] > > Christoph, do you mind sending me a series that you think is stable > enough for linux-next? The numbers are pretty impressive and I'd > love to give them some testing locally and in linux-next. > > How should we coordinate the per-CPU ops patches, btw? We had > pretty good experience with the per-cpu allocator patches where > Tejun merged the patches in his tree and I pulled it in > slab.git. Who handles the per-cpu ops? I'll be happy to apply the per-cpu ops part. Christoph, would it be okay to apply patches from this posting? Thanks. -- tejun