From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@gmail.com>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI BUS
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:51:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CFCC048.4030408@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201011291745.22566.arnd@arndb.de>
Hello.
On 29-11-2010 19:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> The I/O ordering is probably not what you think it is.
>>> There is no ordering guarantee between __raw_writel and
>>> spin_lock/spin_unlock, so you really should be using
>>> readl/writel.
>> No he really should NOT use readl/writel. The ONLY difference
>> between readl/writel and __raw_readl/__raw_writel is endianess
>> conversion. __raw_*l is not doing it. Which to use depend only
>> on HW.
> There are many differences between readl and __raw_readl, including
> * __raw_readl does not have barriers and does not serialize with
> spinlocks, so it breaks on out-of-order CPUs.
> * __raw_readl does not have a specific endianess, while readl is
> fixed little-endian,
I know I'm late but readl()/writel() are CPU-endian, not LE.
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-06 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 12:24 [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI BUS Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-28 19:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 12:17 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 16:05 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 16:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 18:52 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 20:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 20:19 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-30 8:15 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-30 9:34 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-01 11:52 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-01 13:08 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-01 15:02 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-06 10:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2010-12-06 12:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 19:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 19:57 ` Paulius Zaleckas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-20 14:27 [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI Bus Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-20 19:30 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-26 11:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 11:57 ` Michał Mirosław
2010-11-27 12:16 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-27 13:01 ` Michał Mirosław
2010-11-27 15:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 8:12 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 14:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 14:50 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-30 15:38 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-30 16:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 16:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-01 15:05 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CFCC048.4030408@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=paulius.zaleckas@gmail.com \
--cc=ulli.kroll@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox