From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755796Ab0LHUYI (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:24:08 -0500 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:25153 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755395Ab0LHUYF (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:24:05 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6191"; a="65828249" Message-ID: <4CFFE965.30906@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:24:05 -0800 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Walker CC: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Saravana Kannan , Nicolas Pitre , John Stultz , Brian Swetland , Arve Hj?nnev?g Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay() References: <1291783128-27520-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1291783128-27520-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1291836162.12568.17.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <1291836162.12568.17.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/08/2010 11:22 AM, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:38 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> + >> +static void (*delay_fn)(unsigned long) = delay_loop; >> + >> +void set_delay_fn(void (*fn)(unsigned long)) >> +{ >> + delay_fn = fn; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * loops = usecs * HZ * loops_per_jiffy / 1000000 >> + */ >> +void __delay(unsigned long loops) >> +{ >> + delay_fn(loops); >> +} >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay); > Didn't we already go over this part ? Why are aren't you putting these > in a header file ? Last time we saw that inlining set_delay_fn() actually increased the text size of the kernel. I know it sounds wrong, but its probably due to that compiler behavior Russell posted about last month on arm-lkml. I'd like to see what Russell wants to do since so far he's been silent on this whole series. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.