From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753408Ab0LIO1h (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:27:37 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:47870 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752421Ab0LIO1f (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:27:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4D00E74B.3030401@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:27:23 +0100 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: Guan Xuetao , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 000/211] unicore32 architecture support References: <01ca01cb9783$7818c3f0$684a4bd0$@mprc.pku.edu.cn> <4D00A672.9050906@kernel.org> <4D00E212.9080001@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/2010 03:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > It's not a question of merging. It's a question of reviewing and I've > done quite a bunch of reviews on new archs, so I know what I'm talking > about. Reviewing a single patch with everything and the world included > is just not workable. Sure, I agree the per-topic patch series would be much better for reviewing. Then, just make _that_ point. Don't go to the opposite extreme and claim unthreaded per-file 200+ patches in whatever order are better as that's painful for everyone on the mailing list. Thanks. -- tejun