From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757300Ab0LKAKE (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:10:04 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:37178 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754850Ab0LKAKC (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:10:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4D02C14E.80001@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 01:09:50 +0100 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true References: <20101207015834.196176991@goodmis.org> <20101207021328.847976021@goodmis.org> <4CFE0346.6090904@kernel.org> <1292026104.5015.1540.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <1292026104.5015.1540.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/11/2010 01:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Yeah, I was lost thinking about the busiest case where workers are >> busy processing works consecutively. Usually workers are of course >> switching in and out of idle state all the time. >> >> How about just dropping likely/unlikely? > > OK, if I just remove it, can I add your Acked-by? Sure, then, I'll route it through my tree. Thanks. -- tejun