From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753652Ab0LOQf5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:35:57 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53675 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750874Ab0LOQfz (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:35:55 -0500 Message-ID: <4D08EE11.3050603@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:34:25 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Christoph Lameter , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Peter Zijlstra , Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 3/5] irq_work: Use per cpu atomics instead of regular atomics References: <20101214162842.542421046@linux.com> <20101214162854.218751478@linux.com> <4D08EDA9.3090801@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4D08EDA9.3090801@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/15/2010 08:32 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 12/14/2010 05:28 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: >> The irq work queue is a per cpu object and it is sufficient for >> synchronization if per cpu atomics are used. Doing so simplifies >> the code and reduces the overhead of the code. >> >> Before: >> >> christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 451 8 1 460 1cc kernel/irq_work.o >> >> After: >> >> christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o >> text data bss dec hex filename >> 438 8 1 447 1bf kernel/irq_work.o >> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra > > Peter, can you please ack this one? > > Thanks. > Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin ... for tis whole series. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.