From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757337Ab0LPUnK (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:43:10 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53689 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757256Ab0LPUnG (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:43:06 -0500 Message-ID: <4D0A799F.4060408@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:42:07 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Christoph Lameter , Eric Dumazet , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics References: <20101214162842.542421046@linux.com> <20101214162855.392020353@linux.com> <1292345072.5934.32.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D07A2B7.8080405@zytor.com> <4D07A7CB.7010205@zytor.com> <4D07A95C.7030703@kernel.org> <4D0814AF.7080209@zytor.com> <4D08ECEF.3040909@kernel.org> <4D08EE57.8010602@zytor.com> <4D08EF4E.8070403@kernel.org> <4D0A3AF2.50508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D0A3AF2.50508@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/16/2010 08:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hey, again. > > On 12/15/2010 05:39 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> I'd prefer percpu things going through percpu tree, if for nothing >> else for git history's sake, but I don't think it really matters. The >> series is spread all over the place anyway. As long as each >> maintainer is properly alerted about the changes, it should be okay. >> Please let me know whether you agree with the changes currently queued >> in percpu#for-next. I'll update the tree with your Acked-by's and >> freeze it. > > Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next? If so, > I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously > mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series. > Just finished reviewing the patches in percpu#for-next. Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin Look good. Let me know when you have a baseline I can pull into a tip branch so we can build the rest of the patches on top. -hpa