From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Tom Lyon <pugs@cisco.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] genirq: Inform handler about line sharing state
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:31:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0B3C11.4090307@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1012171116480.12146@localhost6.localdomain6>
Am 17.12.2010 11:23, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 16.12.2010 21:26, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Am 16.12.2010 14:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> + if (old_action && (old_action->flags & IRQF_ADAPTIVE) &&
>>>>> + !(desc->irq_data.drv_status & IRQS_SHARED)) {
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Signal the old handler that is has to switch to shareable
>>>>> + * handling mode. Disable the line to avoid any conflict with
>>>>> + * a real IRQ.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + disable_irq(irq);
>>>>
>>>> This is weird, really. I thought you wanted to avoid waiting for the
>>>> threaded handler to finish if it's on the fly. So this should be
>>>> disable_irq_nosync() or did you change your mind ?
>>>
>>> No, I did not. I wanted to avoid that we set MAKE_SHAREABLE while there
>>> might be another IRQ in flight. The handler that is called due to a real
>>> IRQ might misinterpret MAKE_SHAREABLE as "there is no real event" and
>>> perform the wrong steps (at least the current implementation for KVM would).
>>
>> Actually, the requirement we have to fulfill here is to avoid that the
>> hardirq handler sees !SHARED while the threaded one reads "SHARED". To
>> achieve this without disabling the line, I'm still searching for a way
>> to couple the sharing state of associated hard and threaded handler runs
>> - but I think there is no reliable association, is there?
>
> Unfortunately not. So the only way to solve that is disabling the
> interrupt which makes sure that all handlers have completed.
Hmm, what a pity.
>
> OTOH, if we have to disable anyway, then we could simply keep it
> disabled across the installation of a new handler. That would make the
> notification business go away, wouldn't it ?
No, the notification is still necessary in case the registered handler
keeps the line off after returning from both hard and threaded handler.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-17 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-13 22:59 [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM & genirq: Enable adaptive IRQ sharing for passed-through devices Jan Kiszka
2010-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] genirq: Introduce driver-readable IRQ status word Jan Kiszka
2010-12-14 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-14 23:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] genirq: Inform handler about line sharing state Jan Kiszka
2010-12-14 20:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-14 23:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 14:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 14:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 15:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 15:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 16:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-14 21:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-14 23:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 8:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-15 9:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-15 9:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-16 13:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-16 20:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-16 21:28 ` change of email address: pugs@cisco.com -> pugs@ieee.org Tom Lyon
2010-12-17 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] genirq: Inform handler about line sharing state Jan Kiszka
2010-12-17 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-17 10:31 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-12-17 10:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-17 10:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-17 15:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-17 16:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-12-17 16:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-12-18 18:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] genirq: Add support for IRQF_COND_ONESHOT Jan Kiszka
2010-12-13 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices Jan Kiszka
2010-12-14 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM & genirq: Enable adaptive IRQ sharing for passed-through devices Avi Kivity
2010-12-14 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0B3C11.4090307@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pugs@cisco.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox