From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756735Ab0LRPfj (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:35:39 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:56552 "EHLO mail-bw0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754621Ab0LRPfh (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:35:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Eto9Z38NLl2YxIkkvflOlevxh5uI789fO5jmbzkcn/B1mQBzDMztN5dtsLZT26HRFG SoC4Een83PZYwmekYKYac7V93vRSN9L+B8cPjS7+iWUSg7KPIp5yp5+HJE+B50jDm6gL GgO2WMhbbuYDpXFUPIH5Dy88PkLM61KMUi9V4= Message-ID: <4D0CD4C6.5010309@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:35:34 +0100 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , Eric Dumazet , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt References: <20101214162842.542421046@linux.com> <20101214162855.392020353@linux.com> <1292345072.5934.32.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4D07A2B7.8080405@zytor.com> <4D07A7CB.7010205@zytor.com> <4D07A95C.7030703@kernel.org> <4D0814AF.7080209@zytor.com> <4D08ECEF.3040909@kernel.org> <4D08EE57.8010602@zytor.com> <4D08EF4E.8070403@kernel.org> <4D0A3AF2.50508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/16/2010 07:13 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > It is more effective to use a segment prefix instead of calculating the > address of the current cpu area amd then testing flags. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter For this and the other x86 patch. Acked-by: Tejun Heo I suppose these two x86 patches and the gameport one would go through the x86 tree, right? Thank you. -- tejun