From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, Lori Gilbertson <loriann@sgi.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Early kernel messages are overflowing the static log buffer
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:56:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D1249ED.9040008@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101222131719.GA8061@htj.dyndns.org>
Thanks.
I have a patchset almost ready for submission. We have a giant
system (6 racks with some huge amount of nodes) for a few more
days, and the buffer still overflowed with my changes. So I'm
making one more tweak to cut down the amount of characters
generated without losing information.
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 02:09:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> [ 0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [000] 0000 0001 0002 0003 0004 0005 0006 0007 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031
>>>
>>> What I'm asking is which of these would be most acceptable to
>>> either remove or replace with some sort of message reduction?
>> The pcpu alloc messages look entirely superfluous and zappable - make them
>> KERN_DEBUG perhaps (and Cc: Tejun)?
>
> Yeap, with percpu allocator now mostly stable, I don't think the
> message needs to be KERN_INFO anymore. I'll change it to KERN_DEBUG.
>
> Thanks.
>
This doesn't really help the log buffer overflow problem as KERN_DEBUG
messages still end up in the buffer. The pr_debug() macro does compile
out the messages if the system does not have KERNEL debug set, though
distros also have this set as a default.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-13 23:58 Early kernel messages are overflowing the static log buffer Mike Travis
2010-12-22 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-22 13:17 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-22 13:22 ` [PATCH] percpu: print out alloc information with KERN_DEBUG instead of KERN_INFO Tejun Heo
2010-12-22 18:56 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2010-12-22 19:03 ` Early kernel messages are overflowing the static log buffer Mike Travis
2010-12-22 21:21 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D1249ED.9040008@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loriann@sgi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox