From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755015Ab0L3SVW (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:21:22 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:56419 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754812Ab0L3SVW (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:21:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4D1CCD48.5000702@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:19:52 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Christoph Lameter , Eric Dumazet , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt References: <4D07A7CB.7010205@zytor.com> <4D07A95C.7030703@kernel.org> <4D0814AF.7080209@zytor.com> <4D08ECEF.3040909@kernel.org> <4D08EE57.8010602@zytor.com> <4D08EF4E.8070403@kernel.org> <4D0A3AF2.50508@gmail.com> <4D0CD4C6.5010309@gmail.com> <4D0FFB33.8020309@zytor.com> <20101230112933.GB18831@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20101230112933.GB18831@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/30/2010 03:29 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:56:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 12/18/2010 07:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> On 12/16/2010 07:13 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: >>>> It is more effective to use a segment prefix instead of calculating the >>>> address of the current cpu area amd then testing flags. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter >>> >>> For this and the other x86 patch. >>> >>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo >>> >>> I suppose these two x86 patches and the gameport one would go through >>> the x86 tree, right? >>> >> >> Yes, as long as I can get a stable base to pull into -tip. > > I suppose I should take the two x86 and the gameport patches here into > percpu tree with your ACKs too. Would that be okay with you? > Yes, please. Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.