From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751300Ab1ADOSN (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:18:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48514 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750947Ab1ADOSM (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:18:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4D232C20.80306@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:18:08 -0500 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Zhai, Edwin" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "avi@redhat.com" , "mtosatti@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] increase ple_gap default to 64 References: <20110103101907.2926ecca@annuminas.surriel.com> <4D229221.8070305@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4D229221.8070305@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/03/2011 10:21 PM, Zhai, Edwin wrote: > Riel, > Thanks for your patch. I have changed the ple_gap to 128 on xen side, > but forget the patch for KVM:( > > A little bit big is no harm, but more perf data is better. So should I resend the patch with the ple_gap default changed to 128, or are you willing to ack the current patch? -- All rights reversed