From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Yuehai Xu <yuehaixu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com,
rwheeler@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, czoccolo@gmail.com,
yhxu@wayne.edu
Subject: Re: Who does determine the number of requests that can be serving simultaneously in a storage?
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:10:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2710DC.9050908@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingF8jK2Lppng+MCeszB=KFEsqs9uRqBn0Uhdh8@mail.gmail.com>
Please don't top-post, thanks.
On 2011-01-07 14:00, Yuehai Xu wrote:
> I add a tracepoint so that I can get nr_sorted and in_flight[0/1] of
> request_queue when request is completed, I consider nr_sorted as the
> number of pending requests and in_flight[0/1] represent the number
> serving in the storage. Does these two parameters stand for what I
> mean?
nr_sorted is the number of requests that reside in the IO scheduler.
That means requests that are not on the dispatch list yet. in_flight is
the number that the driver is currently handling. So I think your
understanding is correct.
If you look at where you added your trace point, there are already a
trace point right there. I would recommend that you use blktrace, and
then use btt to parse it. That will give you all sorts of queueing
information.
> The test benchmark I use is postmark which simulates the email server
> system, over 90% requests are small random write. The storage is Intel
> M SSD. Generally, I think the number of in_flight[0/1] should be much
> greater than 1, but the result shows that this value is almost 1 no
> matter what I/O scheduler(CFQ/DEADLINE/NOOP) or
> filesystem(EXT4/EXT3/BTRFS) it is. Is it normal?
Depends, do you have more requests pending in the IO scheduler? I'm
assuming you already verified that NCQ is active and working for your
drive.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-07 3:21 Who does determine the number of requests that can be serving simultaneously in a storage? Yuehai Xu
2011-01-07 5:16 ` Yuehai Xu
2011-01-07 8:21 ` Jens Axboe
2011-01-07 13:00 ` Yuehai Xu
2011-01-07 13:10 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-01-07 13:23 ` Yuehai Xu
2011-01-07 15:30 ` Jens Axboe
2011-01-07 16:45 ` Yuehai Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2710DC.9050908@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=yhxu@wayne.edu \
--cc=yuehaixu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox