From: Gregory Auzanneau <greg@reolight.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Loop devices not supported concurrent access ?
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:10:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D290AFD.40809@reolight.net> (raw)
Hello All,
During some tests, I've remark an interesting issue with loop devices.
loop devices queues concurrent access by multi-threaded software.
This issue can easily be highlighted by this tool :
http://box.houkouonchi.jp/seeker_baryluk.c
This tool permit to test how many iop/s your system can handle (don't
forget to use deadline scheduler).
First of all, we will define a loop device on a raw device (raw device
permit to avoid filesystem interaction) :
losetup /dev/loop1 /dev/sda5
Now we will test the number our raw device and our loop device can
handle with only one thread :
./seeker_baryluk /dev/sda5 1 => Results: 196 seeks/second, 5.081 ms
random access time
./seeker_baryluk /dev/loop1 1 => Results: 194 seeks/second, 5.131 ms
random access time
Results : raw device and loop device have approximately the same
performance with one thread.
Here is the problem : we will now test with 32 threads :
./seeker_baryluk /dev/sda5 32 => Results: 631 seeks/second, 1.585 ms
random access time
./seeker_baryluk /dev/loop1 32 => Results: 194 seeks/second, 5.148 ms
random access time
As you can see, loop device deals request one by one even with parrallel
request.
This involve that we lost a lot of performance performed by NCQ/TCQ
and/or disk balancing.
The same thing also appears in Xen when mapping a disk with a "file".
Is this problem solvable ?
/Thank you all for the good work with linux, keep up with it ! :)
Greg
/
reply other threads:[~2011-01-09 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D290AFD.40809@reolight.net \
--to=greg@reolight.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox