public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Auzanneau <greg@reolight.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Loop devices not supported concurrent access ?
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:10:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D290AFD.40809@reolight.net> (raw)

Hello All,

During some tests, I've remark an interesting issue with loop devices.
loop devices queues concurrent access by multi-threaded software.

This issue can easily be highlighted by this tool : 
http://box.houkouonchi.jp/seeker_baryluk.c
This tool permit to test how many iop/s your system can handle (don't 
forget to use deadline scheduler).

First of all, we will define a loop device on a raw device (raw device 
permit to avoid filesystem interaction) :
losetup /dev/loop1 /dev/sda5

Now we will test the number our raw device and our loop device can 
handle with only one thread :
./seeker_baryluk /dev/sda5 1 => Results: 196 seeks/second, 5.081 ms 
random access time
./seeker_baryluk /dev/loop1 1 => Results: 194 seeks/second, 5.131 ms 
random access time

Results : raw device and loop device have approximately the same 
performance with one thread.

Here is the problem : we will now test with 32 threads :
./seeker_baryluk /dev/sda5 32 => Results: 631 seeks/second, 1.585 ms 
random access time
./seeker_baryluk /dev/loop1 32 => Results: 194 seeks/second, 5.148 ms 
random access time

As you can see, loop device deals request one by one even with parrallel 
request.
This involve that we lost a lot of performance performed by NCQ/TCQ 
and/or disk balancing.

The same thing also appears in Xen when mapping a disk with a "file".

Is this problem solvable ?



/Thank you all for the good work with linux, keep up with it ! :)

Greg

/

                 reply	other threads:[~2011-01-09  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D290AFD.40809@reolight.net \
    --to=greg@reolight.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox