From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: early_quirk check all dev/func in domain 0
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:53:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2B63C1.6050606@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110110160117.GD5275@kroah.com>
On 01/10/2011 08:01 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:59:38AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> go with all buses instead of bus0.
>
> Why? Why limit yourself here?
early stage pci access is via cf8, and we can not use domain there. aka domain is 0.
>
> What's to say I will not have a USB controller on the second domain? If
> you are going to change this, might as well be "correct", right?
later pci-quirks is still there. for the domain 0's will do it early. later pci-quirks will check it again.
>
> Or, if it really doesn't matter, stick with what we have today.
we can avoid to adjust apic timer delta with pm-timer.
Thanks
Yinghai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4D2A1152.1040903@kernel.org>
2011-01-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] pci, usb: Seperate usb handoff func to another file Yinghai Lu
2011-01-09 21:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-01-10 7:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-01-10 9:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-01-10 15:57 ` Greg KH
2011-01-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: early_quirk check all dev/func in domain 0 Yinghai Lu
2011-01-10 16:01 ` Greg KH
2011-01-10 19:53 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2011-01-09 19:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: usb handoff in early_quirk Yinghai Lu
2011-01-10 16:00 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2B63C1.6050606@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox