From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757352Ab1ANHi5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:38:57 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:55567 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218Ab1ANHit (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:38:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4D2FFF00.8020702@suse.de> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:45:04 +0100 From: Hannes Reinecke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101026 SUSE/3.0.10 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Snitzer Cc: "Jun'ichi Nomura" , Kiyoshi Ueda , michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, tytso@mit.edu, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jaxboe@fusionio.com, vst@vlnb.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, device-mapper development , James.Bottomley@suse.de, Sergei Shtylyov , konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, rwheeler@redhat.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, chris.mason@oracle.com, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: training mpath to discern between SCSI errors References: <4C7B984E.4070802@suse.de> <4C7B9F14.9080900@mvista.com> <4C7BA670.2060303@suse.de> <4C7BC5B4.3010707@suse.de> <4CBC00B3.7090603@ce.jp.nec.com> <4CBC35AE.9050002@suse.de> <20101119031149.GA28455@us.ibm.com> <20101130225956.GA8882@redhat.com> <4D0B31B5.101@suse.de> <20101217140605.GA740@redhat.com> <20110114010948.GA21818@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110114010948.GA21818@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/14/2011 02:09 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17 2010 at 9:06am -0500, > Mike Snitzer wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 17 2010 at 4:47am -0500, >> Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> >>> On 11/30/2010 11:59 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: >>>> Hannes, >>>> >>>> Any chance you've had time to fold your proposed logging changes in and >>>> rebase this patch? Could you post that updated patch? >>>> >>> yes, will be following shortly. >>> >>>> I'd like to help see this patch through to inclussion when 2.6.38 merge >>>> window opens. I can help with further review, testing and development. >>>> >>> Ok, thanks. >> >> I took some steps at furthering your work. Here is the cover letter to >> the patches I resently sent to dm-devel: >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2010-December/msg00090.html >> >> And here are the patches: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/384612/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/384602/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/390882/ >> >> Please feel free to change these how ever you see fit but your feedback >> is really appreciated. > > Hannes, > > Any update? I'd really like to see this work get upstream ASAP. I'm > doubtful that is possible for 2.6.38 given the merge window is likely to > close shortly. > Sorry for the late answer; the above patches somehow got lost in my various mail folders :-( But yes, the patchset looks okay. Feel free to add my Acked-by: to last two. > Regardless, if we could get consensus on this work now and then stage it > with James that would be great. > Indeed. Will you resend it to linux-scsi or shall I do it? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)