From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -perf/perf/core 5/6] perf probe: Add variable filter support
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:12:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D363A98.8020906@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110117120721.GB3902@ghostprotocols.net>
(2011/01/17 21:07), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:42:05AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> (2011/01/14 6:18), Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
>>> I'm wondering if the different syntax below could be simpler:
>>>
>>> $ perf probe add <probe>
>>> $ perf probe del <probe>
>>> $ perf probe show
>>> $ perf probe list <line>
>>> ... --vars[=<pattern>] [--externs] <probe>
>>> ... --funcs[=<pattern>]
>
>> Hm, well, if no one complains about changing the syntax of perf probe,
>> it may make things simple (maybe we'll also have to drop "perf probe
>> <PROBE>" syntax). Nowadays we already have perf-kvm, perf-sched, etc.
>> which use sub-sub commands.
>
>> IMHO, for avoiding confusion old options and "perf-list", below
>> sub-sub commands are more suitable.
>
>> $ perf probe add <probe>
>> $ perf probe del <probe>
>> $ perf probe list
>> $ perf probe lines <line>
>> $ perf probe vars [--filter=<pattern>|-F <pattern>] [--extern] <probe>
>> $ perf probe funcs [--filter=<pattern>|-F <pattern>]
>
> Right, and when packaging, we can do just like Ingo and Thomas are doing
> with 'perf trace', create a hardlink and if argv[0] is 'probe', that is
> an alias to 'perf probe', so we would do it just like:
>
> $ probe add <probe>
> $ probe del <probe>
> $ probe list
> $ probe lines <line>
> $ probe vars [--filter=<pattern>|-F <pattern>] [--extern] <probe>
> $ probe funcs [--filter=<pattern>|-F <pattern>]
Looks good! :)
BTW, it seems that 'make clean' doesn't cleanup that
'trace' hardlink...
>
> [root@felicio ~]# probe
> bash: probe: command not found...
>
> Also google told me that there was an /sbin/probe utility, but that was
> a long time ago, in the kernel-pcmcia-cs package, nowadays we have
> pcmciautils and it doesn't have this command, so I think it is up for
> grabs :-)
>
> So I think that the 'probe funcs' makes sense, will apply that patch in
> perf/core.
Thanks!
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-13 12:45 [PATCH -perf/perf/core 0/6] Perf probe update (support inline call-site/--funcs/--filter) Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-13 12:45 ` [PATCH -perf/perf/core 1/6] perf probe: Introduce lines walker interface Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-26 7:22 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-13 12:46 ` [PATCH -perf/perf/core 2/6] perf probe: Enable to put probe inline function call site Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-26 7:22 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-13 12:46 ` [PATCH -perf/perf/core 3/6] perf probe: Add --funcs to show available functions in symtab Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-13 21:24 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2011-01-14 9:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-14 9:53 ` [PATCH -perf/perf/core ] perf probe: Update perf-probe.txt for --funcs Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-15 16:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-26 7:23 ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Add --funcs to show available functions in symtab tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-13 12:46 ` [PATCH -perf/perf/core 4/6] perf: Add strfilter for general purpose string filter Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-13 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-13 13:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-17 12:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-17 12:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-17 16:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-18 13:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-13 12:46 ` [PATCH -perf/perf/core 5/6] perf probe: Add variable filter support Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-13 21:18 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2011-01-14 2:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-01-17 12:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-19 1:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2011-01-13 12:46 ` [PATCH -perf/perf/core 6/6] perf probe: Add filters support for available functions Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D363A98.8020906@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox