* [PATCH] blktrace: Don't output messages if the user sets some action mask. @ 2011-01-18 6:43 Tao Ma 2011-01-18 15:50 ` Jeff Moyer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Tao Ma @ 2011-01-18 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Steven Rostedt, Frederic Weisbecker From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. But if I do like this: blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is appropriate for a user. So this patch will disable any messages if the user specify what he want to see. Now the output for the same command will look like: 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] Yes, it is what I want to see. Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> --- kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c index 153562d..8219ffa 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c @@ -138,6 +138,14 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) !blk_tracer_enabled)) return; + /* + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really + * want to see. + */ + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) + return; + local_irq_save(flags); buf = per_cpu_ptr(bt->msg_data, smp_processor_id()); va_start(args, fmt); -- 1.6.3.GIT ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blktrace: Don't output messages if the user sets some action mask. 2011-01-18 6:43 [PATCH] blktrace: Don't output messages if the user sets some action mask Tao Ma @ 2011-01-18 15:50 ` Jeff Moyer 2011-01-19 3:09 ` [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set Tao Ma 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jeff Moyer @ 2011-01-18 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tao Ma; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jens Axboe, Steven Rostedt, Frederic Weisbecker Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma> writes: > From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> > > Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the > trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. > But if I do like this: > blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - > I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command > dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct > > I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): > 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced > 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request > 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr > 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 > 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 > 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) > 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert > 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request > 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 > 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] > 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] > 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 > 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 > 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 > 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch > 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 > 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 > 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr > 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue > > See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is > appropriate for a user. > > So this patch will disable any messages if the user specify what he want to > see. Now the output for the same command will look like: > 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] > 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] > > Yes, it is what I want to see. > > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> > --- > kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > index 153562d..8219ffa 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > @@ -138,6 +138,14 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) > !blk_tracer_enabled)) > return; > > + /* > + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note > + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really > + * want to see. > + */ > + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) > + return; > + I think you want to check for the BLK_TC_NOTIFY bit. Cheers, Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. 2011-01-18 15:50 ` Jeff Moyer @ 2011-01-19 3:09 ` Tao Ma 2011-01-19 5:36 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Tao Ma @ 2011-01-19 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Jens Axboe, Steven Rostedt, Jeff Moyer Hi Jeff, On 01/18/2011 11:50 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Tao Ma<tm@tao.ma> writes: > >> + /* >> + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note >> + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really >> + * want to see. >> + */ >> + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) >> + return; >> + > > I think you want to check for the BLK_TC_NOTIFY bit. I was thinking of this, but actually there is no way for the user to set this flag. At least from blktrace(8), -a doesn't have any flags like NOTIFY. So if the user set any flag, NOTIFY will be cleared. So it does work. Thanks. Here is the updated patch. >From 8693c19f165b09f60d5c26aed369d79a79e144ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:51:44 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. But if I do like this: blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is appropriate for a user. So this patch will disable any messages if the BLK_TC_NOTIFY isn't set. Now the output for the same command will look like: 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] Yes, it is what I want to see. Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> --- kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c index 153562d..d95721f 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c @@ -138,6 +138,13 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) !blk_tracer_enabled)) return; + /* + * If the BLK_TC_NOTIFY action mask isn't set, don't send any note + * message to the trace. + */ + if (!(bt->act_mask & BLK_TC_NOTIFY)) + return; + local_irq_save(flags); buf = per_cpu_ptr(bt->msg_data, smp_processor_id()); va_start(args, fmt); -- 1.6.3.GIT ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. 2011-01-19 3:09 ` [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set Tao Ma @ 2011-01-19 5:36 ` Jens Axboe 2011-01-19 6:09 ` Tao Ma 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2011-01-19 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tao Ma; +Cc: linux-kernel, Steven Rostedt, Jeff Moyer On 2011-01-18 20:09, Tao Ma wrote: > Hi Jeff, > On 01/18/2011 11:50 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> Tao Ma<tm@tao.ma> writes: >> >>> + /* >>> + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note >>> + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really >>> + * want to see. >>> + */ >>> + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) >>> + return; >>> + >> >> I think you want to check for the BLK_TC_NOTIFY bit. > I was thinking of this, but actually there is no way for the user to set this flag. > At least from blktrace(8), -a doesn't have any flags like NOTIFY. So if the user > set any flag, NOTIFY will be cleared. So it does work. Thanks. > > Here is the updated patch. > > From 8693c19f165b09f60d5c26aed369d79a79e144ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> > Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:51:44 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. > > Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the > trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. > But if I do like this: > blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - > I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command > dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct > > I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): > 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced > 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request > 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr > 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 > 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 > 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) > 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert > 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request > 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 > 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] > 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] > 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 > 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 > 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 > 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch > 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 > 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 > 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr > 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue > > See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is > appropriate for a user. > > So this patch will disable any messages if the BLK_TC_NOTIFY isn't set. > Now the output for the same command will look like: > 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] > 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] > > Yes, it is what I want to see. > > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> > --- > kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > index 153562d..d95721f 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c > @@ -138,6 +138,13 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) > !blk_tracer_enabled)) > return; > > + /* > + * If the BLK_TC_NOTIFY action mask isn't set, don't send any note > + * message to the trace. > + */ > + if (!(bt->act_mask & BLK_TC_NOTIFY)) > + return; > + > local_irq_save(flags); > buf = per_cpu_ptr(bt->msg_data, smp_processor_id()); > va_start(args, fmt); Hmm, it should only mask messages, not task/timestamp notifies. This will mask all of them. The message mask I agree with, but the other ones should essentially be unmaskable. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. 2011-01-19 5:36 ` Jens Axboe @ 2011-01-19 6:09 ` Tao Ma 2011-01-19 13:43 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Tao Ma @ 2011-01-19 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-kernel, Steven Rostedt, Jeff Moyer On 01/19/2011 01:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 2011-01-18 20:09, Tao Ma wrote: >> Hi Jeff, >> On 01/18/2011 11:50 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>> Tao Ma<tm@tao.ma> writes: >>> >>>> + /* >>>> + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note >>>> + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really >>>> + * want to see. >>>> + */ >>>> + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) >>>> + return; >>>> + >>> >>> I think you want to check for the BLK_TC_NOTIFY bit. >> I was thinking of this, but actually there is no way for the user to set this flag. >> At least from blktrace(8), -a doesn't have any flags like NOTIFY. So if the user >> set any flag, NOTIFY will be cleared. So it does work. Thanks. >> >> Here is the updated patch. >> >> From 8693c19f165b09f60d5c26aed369d79a79e144ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:51:44 +0800 >> Subject: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. >> >> Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the >> trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. >> But if I do like this: >> blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - >> I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command >> dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct >> >> I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): >> 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced >> 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request >> 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr >> 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 >> 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 >> 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) >> 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert >> 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request >> 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 >> 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >> 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >> 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 >> 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 >> 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 >> 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch >> 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 >> 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 >> 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr >> 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue >> >> See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is >> appropriate for a user. >> >> So this patch will disable any messages if the BLK_TC_NOTIFY isn't set. >> Now the output for the same command will look like: >> 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >> 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >> >> Yes, it is what I want to see. >> >> Cc: Jens Axboe<axboe@kernel.dk> >> Cc: Steven Rostedt<rostedt@goodmis.org> >> Cc: Jeff Moyer<jmoyer@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >> --- >> kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 7 +++++++ >> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >> index 153562d..d95721f 100644 >> --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >> +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >> @@ -138,6 +138,13 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) >> !blk_tracer_enabled)) >> return; >> >> + /* >> + * If the BLK_TC_NOTIFY action mask isn't set, don't send any note >> + * message to the trace. >> + */ >> + if (!(bt->act_mask& BLK_TC_NOTIFY)) >> + return; >> + >> local_irq_save(flags); >> buf = per_cpu_ptr(bt->msg_data, smp_processor_id()); >> va_start(args, fmt); > > Hmm, it should only mask messages, not task/timestamp notifies. This > will mask all of them. uh, yes, that's the reason why I put the check in __trace_note_message, not in trace_note. trace_note_time and trace_note_tsk will handle time/task issue and then call trace_note with the appropriate action mask. Do I miss something here? > > The message mask I agree with, but the other ones should essentially be > unmaskable. yeah, agree. Regards, Tao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. 2011-01-19 6:09 ` Tao Ma @ 2011-01-19 13:43 ` Jens Axboe 2011-01-19 15:04 ` Jeff Moyer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2011-01-19 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tao Ma; +Cc: linux-kernel, Steven Rostedt, Jeff Moyer On 2011-01-18 23:09, Tao Ma wrote: > On 01/19/2011 01:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 2011-01-18 20:09, Tao Ma wrote: >>> Hi Jeff, >>> On 01/18/2011 11:50 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>>> Tao Ma<tm@tao.ma> writes: >>>> >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note >>>>> + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really >>>>> + * want to see. >>>>> + */ >>>>> + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) >>>>> + return; >>>>> + >>>> >>>> I think you want to check for the BLK_TC_NOTIFY bit. >>> I was thinking of this, but actually there is no way for the user to set this flag. >>> At least from blktrace(8), -a doesn't have any flags like NOTIFY. So if the user >>> set any flag, NOTIFY will be cleared. So it does work. Thanks. >>> >>> Here is the updated patch. >>> >>> From 8693c19f165b09f60d5c26aed369d79a79e144ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >>> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:51:44 +0800 >>> Subject: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. >>> >>> Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the >>> trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. >>> But if I do like this: >>> blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - >>> I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command >>> dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct >>> >>> I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 >>> 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >>> 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr >>> 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue >>> >>> See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is >>> appropriate for a user. >>> >>> So this patch will disable any messages if the BLK_TC_NOTIFY isn't set. >>> Now the output for the same command will look like: >>> 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >>> 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >>> >>> Yes, it is what I want to see. >>> >>> Cc: Jens Axboe<axboe@kernel.dk> >>> Cc: Steven Rostedt<rostedt@goodmis.org> >>> Cc: Jeff Moyer<jmoyer@redhat.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >>> --- >>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 7 +++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>> index 153562d..d95721f 100644 >>> --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>> +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>> @@ -138,6 +138,13 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) >>> !blk_tracer_enabled)) >>> return; >>> >>> + /* >>> + * If the BLK_TC_NOTIFY action mask isn't set, don't send any note >>> + * message to the trace. >>> + */ >>> + if (!(bt->act_mask& BLK_TC_NOTIFY)) >>> + return; >>> + >>> local_irq_save(flags); >>> buf = per_cpu_ptr(bt->msg_data, smp_processor_id()); >>> va_start(args, fmt); >> >> Hmm, it should only mask messages, not task/timestamp notifies. This >> will mask all of them. > uh, yes, that's the reason why I put the check in __trace_note_message, > not in trace_note. trace_note_time and trace_note_tsk will handle > time/task issue and then call trace_note with the appropriate action > mask. Do I miss something here? You did, I missed that. Patch looks fine then, I'll queue it up. Thanks! -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. 2011-01-19 13:43 ` Jens Axboe @ 2011-01-19 15:04 ` Jeff Moyer 2011-01-19 15:06 ` Jens Axboe 2011-01-19 15:13 ` Tao Ma 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jeff Moyer @ 2011-01-19 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: Tao Ma, linux-kernel, Steven Rostedt Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes: > On 2011-01-18 23:09, Tao Ma wrote: >> On 01/19/2011 01:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 2011-01-18 20:09, Tao Ma wrote: >>>> Hi Jeff, >>>> On 01/18/2011 11:50 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>>>> Tao Ma<tm@tao.ma> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note >>>>>> + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really >>>>>> + * want to see. >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) >>>>>> + return; >>>>>> + >>>>> >>>>> I think you want to check for the BLK_TC_NOTIFY bit. >>>> I was thinking of this, but actually there is no way for the user to set this flag. >>>> At least from blktrace(8), -a doesn't have any flags like NOTIFY. So if the user >>>> set any flag, NOTIFY will be cleared. So it does work. Thanks. >>>> >>>> Here is the updated patch. >>>> >>>> From 8693c19f165b09f60d5c26aed369d79a79e144ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>> From: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >>>> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:51:44 +0800 >>>> Subject: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. >>>> >>>> Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the >>>> trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. >>>> But if I do like this: >>>> blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - >>>> I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command >>>> dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct >>>> >>>> I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 >>>> 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >>>> 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr >>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue >>>> >>>> See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is >>>> appropriate for a user. >>>> >>>> So this patch will disable any messages if the BLK_TC_NOTIFY isn't set. >>>> Now the output for the same command will look like: >>>> 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >>>> 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >>>> >>>> Yes, it is what I want to see. >>>> >>>> Cc: Jens Axboe<axboe@kernel.dk> >>>> Cc: Steven Rostedt<rostedt@goodmis.org> >>>> Cc: Jeff Moyer<jmoyer@redhat.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >>>> --- >>>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 7 +++++++ >>>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>> index 153562d..d95721f 100644 >>>> --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>> +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>> @@ -138,6 +138,13 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) >>>> !blk_tracer_enabled)) >>>> return; >>>> >>>> + /* >>>> + * If the BLK_TC_NOTIFY action mask isn't set, don't send any note >>>> + * message to the trace. >>>> + */ >>>> + if (!(bt->act_mask& BLK_TC_NOTIFY)) >>>> + return; >>>> + >>>> local_irq_save(flags); >>>> buf = per_cpu_ptr(bt->msg_data, smp_processor_id()); >>>> va_start(args, fmt); >>> >>> Hmm, it should only mask messages, not task/timestamp notifies. This >>> will mask all of them. >> uh, yes, that's the reason why I put the check in __trace_note_message, >> not in trace_note. trace_note_time and trace_note_tsk will handle >> time/task issue and then call trace_note with the appropriate action >> mask. Do I miss something here? > > You did, I missed that. Patch looks fine then, I'll queue it up. Thanks! I was guessing at the use of BLK_TC_NOTIFY for this. Should there be another flag for these messages, so they aren't conflated with task/timestamp notifications? Cheers, Jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. 2011-01-19 15:04 ` Jeff Moyer @ 2011-01-19 15:06 ` Jens Axboe 2011-01-19 15:13 ` Tao Ma 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2011-01-19 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Moyer; +Cc: Tao Ma, linux-kernel, Steven Rostedt On 2011-01-19 08:04, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes: > >> On 2011-01-18 23:09, Tao Ma wrote: >>> On 01/19/2011 01:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> On 2011-01-18 20:09, Tao Ma wrote: >>>>> Hi Jeff, >>>>> On 01/18/2011 11:50 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>>>>> Tao Ma<tm@tao.ma> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> + /* >>>>>>> + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note >>>>>>> + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really >>>>>>> + * want to see. >>>>>>> + */ >>>>>>> + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) >>>>>>> + return; >>>>>>> + >>>>>> >>>>>> I think you want to check for the BLK_TC_NOTIFY bit. >>>>> I was thinking of this, but actually there is no way for the user to set this flag. >>>>> At least from blktrace(8), -a doesn't have any flags like NOTIFY. So if the user >>>>> set any flag, NOTIFY will be cleared. So it does work. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the updated patch. >>>>> >>>>> From 8693c19f165b09f60d5c26aed369d79a79e144ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >>>>> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:51:44 +0800 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. >>>>> >>>>> Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the >>>>> trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. >>>>> But if I do like this: >>>>> blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - >>>>> I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command >>>>> dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct >>>>> >>>>> I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 >>>>> 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >>>>> 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue >>>>> >>>>> See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is >>>>> appropriate for a user. >>>>> >>>>> So this patch will disable any messages if the BLK_TC_NOTIFY isn't set. >>>>> Now the output for the same command will look like: >>>>> 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >>>>> 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >>>>> >>>>> Yes, it is what I want to see. >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Jens Axboe<axboe@kernel.dk> >>>>> Cc: Steven Rostedt<rostedt@goodmis.org> >>>>> Cc: Jeff Moyer<jmoyer@redhat.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 7 +++++++ >>>>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>>> index 153562d..d95721f 100644 >>>>> --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>>> +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>>> @@ -138,6 +138,13 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) >>>>> !blk_tracer_enabled)) >>>>> return; >>>>> >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * If the BLK_TC_NOTIFY action mask isn't set, don't send any note >>>>> + * message to the trace. >>>>> + */ >>>>> + if (!(bt->act_mask& BLK_TC_NOTIFY)) >>>>> + return; >>>>> + >>>>> local_irq_save(flags); >>>>> buf = per_cpu_ptr(bt->msg_data, smp_processor_id()); >>>>> va_start(args, fmt); >>>> >>>> Hmm, it should only mask messages, not task/timestamp notifies. This >>>> will mask all of them. >>> uh, yes, that's the reason why I put the check in __trace_note_message, >>> not in trace_note. trace_note_time and trace_note_tsk will handle >>> time/task issue and then call trace_note with the appropriate action >>> mask. Do I miss something here? >> >> You did, I missed that. Patch looks fine then, I'll queue it up. Thanks! > > I was guessing at the use of BLK_TC_NOTIFY for this. Should there be > another flag for these messages, so they aren't conflated with > task/timestamp notifications? The correct check for just a message would be: __BLK_TN_MESSAGE | BLK_TC_ACT(BLK_TC_NOTIFY) -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. 2011-01-19 15:04 ` Jeff Moyer 2011-01-19 15:06 ` Jens Axboe @ 2011-01-19 15:13 ` Tao Ma 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Tao Ma @ 2011-01-19 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Moyer; +Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-kernel On 01/19/2011 11:04 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Jens Axboe<axboe@kernel.dk> writes: > >> On 2011-01-18 23:09, Tao Ma wrote: >>> On 01/19/2011 01:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> On 2011-01-18 20:09, Tao Ma wrote: >>>>> Hi Jeff, >>>>> On 01/18/2011 11:50 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>>>>> Tao Ma<tm@tao.ma> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> + /* >>>>>>> + * If the user does specify some action masks, don't send any note >>>>>>> + * message to the trace so that it won't pollute what the user really >>>>>>> + * want to see. >>>>>>> + */ >>>>>>> + if (bt->act_mask != (u16) -1) >>>>>>> + return; >>>>>>> + >>>>>> I think you want to check for the BLK_TC_NOTIFY bit. >>>>> I was thinking of this, but actually there is no way for the user to set this flag. >>>>> At least from blktrace(8), -a doesn't have any flags like NOTIFY. So if the user >>>>> set any flag, NOTIFY will be cleared. So it does work. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the updated patch. >>>>> >>>>> From 8693c19f165b09f60d5c26aed369d79a79e144ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >>>>> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:51:44 +0800 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set. >>>>> >>>>> Now if we enable blktrace, cfq has too many messages output to the >>>>> trace buffer. It is fine if we don't specify any action mask. >>>>> But if I do like this: >>>>> blktrace /dev/sdb -a issue -a complete -o - | blkparse -i - >>>>> I only want to see 'D' and 'C', while with the following command >>>>> dd if=/mnt/ocfs2/test of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1 iflag=direct >>>>> >>>>> I will get(with a 2.6.37 vanilla kernel): >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000000000 0 m N cfq3805 alloced >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000004126 0 m N cfq3805 insert_request >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000004884 0 m N cfq3805 add_to_rr >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000008417 0 m N cfq workload slice:300 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000009557 0 m N cfq3805 set_active wl_prio:0 wl_type:2 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000010640 0 m N cfq3805 fifo= (null) >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000011193 0 m N cfq3805 dispatch_insert >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000012221 0 m N cfq3805 dispatched a request >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000012802 0 m N cfq3805 activate rq, drv=1 >>>>> 8,16 0 1 0.000013181 3805 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >>>>> 8,16 0 2 0.000164244 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000167997 0 m N cfq3805 complete rqnoidle 0 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000168782 0 m N cfq3805 set_slice=100 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000169874 0 m N cfq3805 arm_idle: 8 group_idle: 0 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000170189 0 m N cfq schedule dispatch >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000397938 0 m N cfq3805 slice expired t=0 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000399763 0 m N cfq3805 sl_used=1 disp=1 charge=1 iops=0 sect=8 >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000400227 0 m N cfq3805 del_from_rr >>>>> 8,16 0 0 0.000400882 0 m N cfq3805 put_queue >>>>> >>>>> See, there are 19 lines while I only need 2. I don't think it is >>>>> appropriate for a user. >>>>> >>>>> So this patch will disable any messages if the BLK_TC_NOTIFY isn't set. >>>>> Now the output for the same command will look like: >>>>> 8,16 0 1 0.000000000 4908 D R 114759 + 8 [dd] >>>>> 8,16 0 2 0.000146827 0 C R 114759 + 8 [0] >>>>> >>>>> Yes, it is what I want to see. >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Jens Axboe<axboe@kernel.dk> >>>>> Cc: Steven Rostedt<rostedt@goodmis.org> >>>>> Cc: Jeff Moyer<jmoyer@redhat.com> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma<boyu.mt@taobao.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 7 +++++++ >>>>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>>> index 153562d..d95721f 100644 >>>>> --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>>> +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c >>>>> @@ -138,6 +138,13 @@ void __trace_note_message(struct blk_trace *bt, const char *fmt, ...) >>>>> !blk_tracer_enabled)) >>>>> return; >>>>> >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * If the BLK_TC_NOTIFY action mask isn't set, don't send any note >>>>> + * message to the trace. >>>>> + */ >>>>> + if (!(bt->act_mask& BLK_TC_NOTIFY)) >>>>> + return; >>>>> + >>>>> local_irq_save(flags); >>>>> buf = per_cpu_ptr(bt->msg_data, smp_processor_id()); >>>>> va_start(args, fmt); >>>> Hmm, it should only mask messages, not task/timestamp notifies. This >>>> will mask all of them. >>> uh, yes, that's the reason why I put the check in __trace_note_message, >>> not in trace_note. trace_note_time and trace_note_tsk will handle >>> time/task issue and then call trace_note with the appropriate action >>> mask. Do I miss something here? >> You did, I missed that. Patch looks fine then, I'll queue it up. Thanks! > I was guessing at the use of BLK_TC_NOTIFY for this. Should there be > another flag for these messages, so they aren't conflated with > task/timestamp notifications? I was thinking of this and gave up. Now we already have 15 different TC_FLAGS(yes, barrier may be removed, but for the compatibility problem, it have to stay there for some time I guess). and it seems we can have 16 flags totally(in blk_io_trace we have a u32 for action and the high 16 bit are used for TC_FLAGS). So I guess a new flag isn't suitable here. Regards, Tao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-19 15:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-01-18 6:43 [PATCH] blktrace: Don't output messages if the user sets some action mask Tao Ma 2011-01-18 15:50 ` Jeff Moyer 2011-01-19 3:09 ` [PATCH v2] blktrace: Don't output messages if NOTIFY isn't set Tao Ma 2011-01-19 5:36 ` Jens Axboe 2011-01-19 6:09 ` Tao Ma 2011-01-19 13:43 ` Jens Axboe 2011-01-19 15:04 ` Jeff Moyer 2011-01-19 15:06 ` Jens Axboe 2011-01-19 15:13 ` Tao Ma
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox