From: Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
AKPM <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Hidetoshi Seto" <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Huang Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
LKLM <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Fix unsuitable behavior for poisoned tail pages of THP.
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:13:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D40B8C0.1040704@np.css.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110125224635.GL926@random.random>
Hi, Andrea
(2011/01/26 7:46), Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:46:32PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
>> When a tail page of THP is poisoned, memory-failure will do
>> nothing except setting poison flag, while the expected behavior is
>> that the process, who is using the poisoned tail page, should be
>> killed.
>>
>> The above problem is caused by lru checking of the poisoned tail page
>> of THP. Because PG_lru flag is only set on the head page of
>> THP, the check always consider the poisoned tail page as NON
>> lru page.
>>
>> So avoid checking NON lru for THP, as like as hugetlb.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> mm/memory-failure.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index 5396603..44a1bdf 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -1046,19 +1046,22 @@ int __memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags)
>> * The check (unnecessarily) ignores LRU pages being isolated and
>> * walked by the page reclaim code, however that's not a big loss.
>> */
>> - if (!PageLRU(p) && !PageHuge(p))
>> - shake_page(p, 0);
>> - if (!PageLRU(p) && !PageHuge(p)) {
>> - /*
>> - * shake_page could have turned it free.
>> - */
>> - if (is_free_buddy_page(p)) {
>> - action_result(pfn, "free buddy, 2nd try", DELAYED);
>> - return 0;
>> + if (!PageCompound(p)) {
>
> Here the check could become a:
>
> if (!PageHuge(p) && !PageTransCompound(p))
>
I will modify it.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Jin Dongming
> so the whole branch is optimized away at build time when both
> hugetlbfs and THP are set =n (or in archs not supporting either of
> those).
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 5:46 [PATCH 3/3] Fix unsuitable behavior for poisoned tail pages of THP Jin Dongming
2011-01-25 22:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-01-27 0:13 ` Jin Dongming [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D40B8C0.1040704@np.css.fujitsu.com \
--to=jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox