Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount

david
2011-01-28T19:27:22Z

On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Dave Chinner wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:09:58PM -0800, david@lang.hm wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> david@lang.hm put forth on 1/27/2011 2:11 PM:
>>>
>>> Picking the perfect mkfs.xfs parameters for a hardware RAID array can be
>>> somewhat of a black art, mainly because no two vendor arrays act or perform
>>> identically.
>>
>> if mkfs.xfs can figure out how to do the 'right thing' for md raid
>> arrays, can there be a mode where it asks the users for the same
>> information that it gets from the kernel?
>
> mkfs.xfs can get the information it needs directly from dm and md
> devices. However, when hardware RAID luns present themselves to the
> OS in an identical manner to single drives, how does mkfs tell the
> difference between a 2TB hardware RAID lun made up of 30x73GB drives
> and a single 2TB SATA drive? The person running mkfs should already
> know this little detail....

that's my point, the person running mkfs knows this information, and can
easily answer questions that mkfs asks (or provide this information on the
command line). but mkfs doesn't ask for this infomation, instead it asks
the user to define a whole bunch of parameters that are not well
understood. An XFS guru can tell you how to configure these parameters
based on different hardware layouts, but as long as it remains a 'back
art' getting new people up to speed is really hard. If this can be reduced
down to

is this a hardware raid device
if yes
how many drives are there
what raid type is used (linear, raid 0, 1, 5, 6, 10)

and whatever questions are needed, it would _greatly_ improve the quality
of the settings that non-guru people end up using.

David Lang