From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754389Ab1A1OWX (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:22:23 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:20349 "EHLO ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752418Ab1A1OWW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:22:22 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBABNgQk1Ld/sX/2dsb2JhbAAMhAjNB5B0gSODOHQEhRg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,392,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="89555764" Message-ID: <4D42D11A.5040201@teksavvy.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:22:18 -0500 From: Mark Lord User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Rees CC: Dave Chinner , Stan Hoeppner , Justin Piszcz , Christoph Hellwig , Alex Elder , Linux Kernel , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount References: <4D40C8D1.8090202@teksavvy.com> <20110127033011.GH21311@dastard> <4D40EB2F.2050809@teksavvy.com> <4D418B57.1000501@teksavvy.com> <4D419765.4070805@teksavvy.com> <4D41CA16.8070001@hardwarefreak.com> <4D41EA04.7010506@teksavvy.com> <20110128001735.GO21311@dastard> <4D421A68.9000607@teksavvy.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11-01-27 11:14 PM, David Rees wrote: > > As suggested before - why are you messing with AGs instead of allocsize? Who said "instead of"? I'm using both. Cheers