From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751565Ab1A1Uxi (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:53:38 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:33508 "EHLO ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751282Ab1A1Uxg (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:53:36 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBAHu7Qk1Ld/sX/2dsb2JhbAAMhAjLTZBsgSODOHQEhRg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,394,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="89632917" Message-ID: <4D432CCD.9010205@teksavvy.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:53:33 -0500 From: Mark Lord User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Torokhov CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ? References: <20110127063815.GA29924@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D414928.80801@redhat.com> <20110127172128.GA19672@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D41C071.2090201@redhat.com> <20110128093922.GA3357@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D42AECE.3020402@redhat.com> <20110128164057.GA6252@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D42F686.8010104@redhat.com> <20110128173305.GC6252@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D4307D7.8010301@redhat.com> <20110128183402.GF6252@core.coreip.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20110128183402.GF6252@core.coreip.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dmitry / Mauro, I'm encouraged by all of the good dialog happening here, and regret that I am unable to poke any further at the issue with ir-keytable for now. The system in question is now getting rebuilt with new/modern userspace, and I expect the original issue to "vanish" as a result. If I do see ir-keytable acting up again afterward, I'll let you know. But it will be whatever version Ubuntu 10.10 installs, not the newer one I used earlier in this thread. Cheers! -Mark