From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] zram/xvmalloc: combine duplicate block delete code
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:31:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D46B9A9.1060205@vflare.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110128150155.GH2062@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 01/28/2011 10:01 AM, Robert Jennings wrote:
> This patch eliminates duplicate code. The remove_block_head function
> is a special case of remove_block which can be contained in remove_block
> without confusion.
>
> The portion of code in remove_block_head which was noted as "DEBUG ONLY"
> is now mandatory. Doing this provides consistent management of the double
> linked list of blocks under a freelist and makes this consolidation
> of delete block code safe. The first and last blocks will have NULL
> pointers in their previous and next page pointers respectively.
>
> Additionally, any time a block is removed from a free list the next and
> previous pointers will be set to NULL to avoid misuse outside xvmalloc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jennings<rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The reason for introducing remove_block_head() as a separate function
was to make malloc slightly faster but since I lack any profiling data,
I'm not very sure if this may impact performance. Ideally, some sort of
data with some malloc heavy test would have been useful. Anyways, I
think major allocator changes will happen when we make xvmalloc
allocated memory reclaimable, so maybe we can defer profiling.
Acked-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Thanks,
Nitin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-31 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-28 14:56 [PATCH 0/7][v2] zram/xvmalloc: 64K page fixes and optimizations Robert Jennings
2011-01-28 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] [v2] zram/vmalloc: Correct tunings to enable use with 64K pages Robert Jennings
2011-01-29 8:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-28 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] [v2] zram: Prevent overflow in logical block size Robert Jennings
2011-01-29 8:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-28 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] [v2] zram/xvmalloc: free bit block insertion optimization Robert Jennings
2011-01-29 8:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-28 14:59 ` [PATCH 4/7] [v2] zram/xvmalloc: create CONFIG_ZRAM_DEBUG for debug code Robert Jennings
2011-01-29 8:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-28 15:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] [v2] zram/xvmalloc: Close 32byte hole on 64bit CPUs Robert Jennings
2011-01-29 8:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-28 15:00 ` [PATCH 6/7] zram: Return zero'd pages on new reads Robert Jennings
2011-01-29 8:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-28 15:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] zram/xvmalloc: combine duplicate block delete code Robert Jennings
2011-01-29 8:50 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-31 13:31 ` Nitin Gupta [this message]
2011-01-29 8:47 ` [PATCH 0/7][v2] zram/xvmalloc: 64K page fixes and optimizations Pekka Enberg
2011-01-29 18:54 ` Robert Jennings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D46B9A9.1060205@vflare.org \
--to=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox