linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:44:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4B1392.5090603@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110203024838.GI5843@random.random>

On 02/02/2011 06:48 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Larry (CC'ed) found a problem with the patch in subject. When
> USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS is not defined (NR_CPUS == 2) it will deadlock in
> ptep_clear_flush_notify in rmap.c because it's sending IPIs with the
> page_table_lock already held, and the other CPUs now spins on the
> page_table_lock with irq disabled, so the IPI never runs. With
> CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y this deadlocks happens even with
> USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS defined so it become visible but it needs to be
> fixed regardless (for NR_CPUS == 2).

What's "it" here?  Do you mean vmalloc_sync_all?  vmalloc_sync_one?
What's the callchain?

> I'd like to understand why the pgd_lock needs irq disabled, it sounds
> too easy that I can just remove the _irqsave, doesn't it?
>
> A pgd_free comment says it can run from irq. page_table_lock having to
> be taken there is for Xen only, but other archs also uses
> spin_lock_irqsave(pgd_lock) so I guess it's either common code, or
> it's superfluous and not another Xen special requirement.

There's no special Xen requirement here.

> If we could remove that _irqsave like below it'd solve it... But
> clearly something must be taking the pgd_lock from irq. (using a
> rwlock would also be possible as long as nobody takes it in write mode
> during irq, but if it's pgd_free that really runs in irq, that would
> need the write_lock so it wouldn't be a solution).

mmdrop() can be called from interrupt context, but I don't know if it
will ever drop the last reference from interrupt, so maybe you can get
away with it.

> I'm trying this fix and the VM_BUG_ON never triggered yet.
>
> In short: who takes the pgd_lock from an irq? (__mmdrop shouldn't but
> maybe I'm overlooking some aio bit?)
>
> ======
> Subject: fix pgd_lock deadlock
>
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
>
> It's forbidden to take the page_table_lock with the irq disabled or if there's
> contention the IPIs (for tlb flushes) sent with the page_table_lock held will
> never run leading to a deadlock.
>
> Apparently nobody takes the pgd_lock from irq so the _irqsave can be removed.

I'm pretty sure this is OK from a Xen perspective.

> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/fault.c    |    7 ++++---
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c  |    7 ++++---
>  arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c |   21 +++++++++++----------
>  arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c  |   10 ++++++----
>  arch/x86/xen/mmu.c     |   10 ++++------
>  5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -230,14 +230,15 @@ void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
>  	     address >= TASK_SIZE && address < FIXADDR_TOP;
>  	     address += PMD_SIZE) {
>  
> -		unsigned long flags;
>  		struct page *page;
>  
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +		VM_BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> +		spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  		list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
>  			spinlock_t *pgt_lock;
>  			pmd_t *ret;
>  
> +			/* the pgt_lock only for Xen */
>  			pgt_lock = &pgd_page_get_mm(page)->page_table_lock;
>  
>  			spin_lock(pgt_lock);
> @@ -247,7 +248,7 @@ void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
>  			if (!ret)
>  				break;
>  		}
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +		spin_unlock(&pgd_lock, flags);

Urp.  Did this compile?

Thanks,
    J

>  	}
>  }
>  
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -105,18 +105,19 @@ void sync_global_pgds(unsigned long star
>  
>  	for (address = start; address <= end; address += PGDIR_SIZE) {
>  		const pgd_t *pgd_ref = pgd_offset_k(address);
> -		unsigned long flags;
>  		struct page *page;
>  
>  		if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +		VM_BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> +		spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  		list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
>  			pgd_t *pgd;
>  			spinlock_t *pgt_lock;
>  
>  			pgd = (pgd_t *)page_address(page) + pgd_index(address);
> +			/* the pgt_lock only for Xen */
>  			pgt_lock = &pgd_page_get_mm(page)->page_table_lock;
>  			spin_lock(pgt_lock);
>  
> @@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ void sync_global_pgds(unsigned long star
>  
>  			spin_unlock(pgt_lock);
>  		}
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +		spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -57,12 +57,11 @@ static unsigned long direct_pages_count[
>  
>  void update_page_count(int level, unsigned long pages)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
>  	/* Protect against CPA */
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	VM_BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> +	spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  	direct_pages_count[level] += pages;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void split_page_count(int level)
> @@ -402,7 +401,7 @@ static int
>  try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address,
>  			struct cpa_data *cpa)
>  {
> -	unsigned long nextpage_addr, numpages, pmask, psize, flags, addr, pfn;
> +	unsigned long nextpage_addr, numpages, pmask, psize, addr, pfn;
>  	pte_t new_pte, old_pte, *tmp;
>  	pgprot_t old_prot, new_prot, req_prot;
>  	int i, do_split = 1;
> @@ -411,7 +410,8 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, uns
>  	if (cpa->force_split)
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	VM_BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> +	spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  	/*
>  	 * Check for races, another CPU might have split this page
>  	 * up already:
> @@ -506,14 +506,14 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, uns
>  	}
>  
>  out_unlock:
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
>  
>  	return do_split;
>  }
>  
>  static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte, unsigned long address)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags, pfn, pfninc = 1;
> +	unsigned long pfn, pfninc = 1;
>  	unsigned int i, level;
>  	pte_t *pbase, *tmp;
>  	pgprot_t ref_prot;
> @@ -527,7 +527,8 @@ static int split_large_page(pte_t *kpte,
>  	if (!base)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	VM_BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> +	spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  	/*
>  	 * Check for races, another CPU might have split this page
>  	 * up for us already:
> @@ -599,7 +600,7 @@ out_unlock:
>  	 */
>  	if (base)
>  		__free_page(base);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -126,9 +126,10 @@ static void pgd_dtor(pgd_t *pgd)
>  	if (SHARED_KERNEL_PMD)
>  		return;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	VM_BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> +	spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  	pgd_list_del(pgd);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -280,12 +281,13 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	 * respect to anything walking the pgd_list, so that they
>  	 * never see a partially populated pgd.
>  	 */
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	VM_BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
> +	spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  
>  	pgd_ctor(mm, pgd);
>  	pgd_prepopulate_pmd(mm, pgd, pmds);
>  
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
>  
>  	return pgd;
>  
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> @@ -986,10 +986,9 @@ static void xen_pgd_pin(struct mm_struct
>   */
>  void xen_mm_pin_all(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct page *page;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
>  		if (!PagePinned(page)) {
> @@ -998,7 +997,7 @@ void xen_mm_pin_all(void)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1099,10 +1098,9 @@ static void xen_pgd_unpin(struct mm_stru
>   */
>  void xen_mm_unpin_all(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct page *page;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
>  		if (PageSavePinned(page)) {
> @@ -1112,7 +1110,7 @@ void xen_mm_unpin_all(void)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock(&pgd_lock);
>  }
>  
>  void xen_activate_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next)
>


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-03 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-14 20:56 [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-15 17:07 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-19 22:17   ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Hold " tip-bot for Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-20 10:36     ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-20 19:31       ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Fix incorrect data type in vmalloc_sync_all() tip-bot for tip-bot for Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-20 19:50         ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-20 19:53           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-20 20:10             ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-20 20:13               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-20 22:11                 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-20 21:26             ` Ben Pfaff
2010-10-20 19:58       ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2010-10-21 21:06 ` [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-10-21 21:26   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-21 21:34     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-03  2:48   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-03 20:44     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-02-04  1:21       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-04 21:27         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-07 23:20           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-15 19:07             ` [PATCH] fix pgd_lock deadlock Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-15 19:26               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-15 19:54                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-15 20:05                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-15 20:26                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-15 22:52                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-15 23:03                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-15 23:17                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-16  9:58                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-16 10:15                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-16 10:28                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 14:49                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-16 16:26                                     ` Rik van Riel
2011-02-16 20:15                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-04-23  9:07                                     ` [2.6.32.y][PATCH] " Philipp Hahn
2012-04-23 19:09                                       ` Willy Tarreau
2011-02-16 18:33                     ` [PATCH] " Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-16 21:34                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-17 10:19                       ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-21 14:30                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-21 14:53                           ` Johannes Weiner
2011-02-22  7:48                             ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-22 13:49                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-22 14:22                                 ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-22 14:34                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-22 17:08                                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-22 17:13                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-24  4:22                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-24  8:23                                     ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-24 14:11                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-21 17:40                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-03 20:59     ` [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync Larry Woodman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D4B1392.5090603@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).