From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix jiffy calculations in calibrate_delay_direct to handle overflow
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:21:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D525CA8.60604@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D525EF00200007800030F0F@vpn.id2.novell.com>
On 02/09/2011 09:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Fixes a hang when booting as dom0 under Xen, when jiffies can be
> quite large by the time the kernel init gets this far.
As I wrote this might happen if the boot till this point takes ~ 5
minutes because we start at -5 minutes.
That said, is this a candidate for stable? (If so, please CC stable.)
> Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
>
> !time_after() -> time_before_eq() as per suggestion from Jiri Slaby.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
>
> ---
> init/calibrate.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- 2.6.38-rc4/init/calibrate.c
> +++ 2.6.38-rc4-calibrate-jiffy-overflow/init/calibrate.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static unsigned long __cpuinit calibrate
> pre_start = 0;
> read_current_timer(&start);
> start_jiffies = jiffies;
> - while (jiffies <= (start_jiffies + 1)) {
> + while (time_before_eq(jiffies, start_jiffies + 1)) {
> pre_start = start;
> read_current_timer(&start);
> }
> @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ static unsigned long __cpuinit calibrate
>
> pre_end = 0;
> end = post_start;
> - while (jiffies <=
> - (start_jiffies + 1 + DELAY_CALIBRATION_TICKS)) {
> + while (time_before_eq(jiffies, start_jiffies + 1 +
> + DELAY_CALIBRATION_TICKS)) {
> pre_end = end;
> read_current_timer(&end);
> }
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-09 8:31 [PATCH] fix jiffy calculations in calibrate_delay_direct to handle overflow Jan Beulich
2011-02-09 9:21 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2011-02-09 9:44 ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-09 9:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-09 13:18 ` Jan Beulich
2011-02-09 18:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-09 20:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-10 8:48 ` Jan Beulich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-10 8:50 Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D525CA8.60604@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=Tim.Deegan@citrix.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox